If you've left me a rating on either my Imaginarium of Dr Parnassus or In the Valley of Elah reviews...
If you've left me a rating on either my Imaginarium of Dr Parnassus or In the Valley of Elah reviews, please let me know as they are showing up as 'not yet rated' even though at least fifteen of you have rated each one.
Member since:11.07.2000
Reviews:778
Members who trust:82
When prince Paris of Troy romances Helen out from under the nose of her husband Menelaus, he gives Menelaus’ brother Agamemnon the perfect excuse to declare war on Troy. With a fleet of a thousand ships, Agamemnon thinks a swift victory is assured, but he has not counted on the cunning and tenacity of the Trojans and in particular Hector, brother of Paris. So he has to do some wheeling and dealing to get the great Greek hero Achilles to fight for him, despite Achilles loathing for his king.
Wolfgang Petersen, who first made his name with the character-centric TV series “Das Boot” has made his Hollywood fortune with a series of spectacular but hollow films like “The Perfect Storm” and “Airforce One”. “Troy” follows in those same sorry footsteps. Instead of sticking to the story set down in Homer’s “Iliad”, Petersen and co-scribe David Benioff seem to have plundered every major Greek epic for material. So we are presented with a continuous stream of characters and episodes that are never successfully tied into a coherent whole. There are too many characters and factions, so we never know who the main characters are. The fact that many of them are never referred to by name or are introduced and then discarded in a matter of minutes or even seconds doesn’t help either. As both groups of combatants (the Greeks and the Trojans) are similarly unlikeable we don’t know who to root for.
The pace is uneven and there is no sense of the passing of time – the Trojan Wars lasted ten years, after all. It would have taken weeks or months to travel by boat from Sparta to Troy, but the film makes it seem as though it’s as easy as a ferry crossing of the English Channel. It is highly improbable that a fleet of a thousand ships could have been organised in such a short space of time. One minute Paris and Hector are arriving in Troy, the next, the alliance of Greek city states is pulling up on the beach, fully armed and baying for blood. The choppy editing doesn’t help the pacing of the film. It was presumably used to inject excitement into
the battle scenes, but is so rapid that it is impossible to see what’s going on, who’s fighting who or to gain any sense of the fear or passion of the soldiers. And though there may be heaps of bodies at the end of every battle I couldn’t bring myself to care about the loss of life. That’s how unaffecting this film is. It is so pitifully thrown together that it hangs in rags instead of being a rich tapestry of interwoven storylines.
Petersen was obviously trying to please too many masters (with fights for the men and love stories for the ladies) and ends up pleasing none. It starts with a narration by Odysseus that disappears after two minutes and isn’t re-introduced until the closing scene (in which he refers to Hector as “the tamer of horses”, something that isn’t even alluded to in the film); it’s fine to have a narrator, but you’ve got to let them narrate. The acting is of variable quality, with Brad Pitt mangling an English accent for no apparent reason and dozens of top quality vintage thespians are wheeled out to recite their lines then take the money and go back to their retirement homes. The battle scenes range from the okay to the laughable, with Eric Bana’s obvious stunt double in a bouffant wig being one of the unintentionally hilarious highlights. The use of CGI to create an entire Greek army was a complete waste of time. If you look you can see the duplicates fighting each other in exactly the same way in little computer generated hexagons. They may as well have taped armour to ants for all of the realism it created. And the Trojan Horse is a big let down. It looks good but instead of being stuffed to the gills with Greek warriors, there are about six little blokes who sneak out of it under cover of darkness.
The two central love stories between Paris and Helen and Achilles and Briseis are totally unbelievable because there is no chemistry between the couples and Achilles seduction of Briseis in particular is absurd. One minute she’s holding a knife to his throat, the next they’re naked and getting down to it. I don’t know about anyone else, but I was willing her to use the knife the whole time.
Considering the low production values (you can tell which bits were shot in Malta and which bits in Mexico by looking at the changing colour of the sky and quality of the film stock), I wasn’t at all surprised to hear that the score was a last minute addition. It is an unwieldy and inappropriate beast that swamps the film by being omnipresent and also by being really loud and schmaltzy during the love scenes and really loud and jarring during the battle scenes. I wish I’d taken earplugs with me, then I would have been spared the double blight of the overpowering soundtrack and the risible script.
It is unclear how Petersen attracted so many talented actors to this epic farce. Perhaps he kidnapped all their families and kept them at gunpoint. I’ve got to admit that I’ve never been a big fan of Brad Pitt and this film doesn’t help his cause. His idea of being dark and brooding is to stand stiff as a board looking constipated. He’s nimble enough during his fight scenes but he really struggles when he’s required to feign love for Briseis. He makes all the right moves but he doesn’t look comfortable with them. He isn’t helped by the dodgy script that forces Achilles, vainglorious lout that he is to get all upset when Priam comes begging for his son’s body. Or that makes the self-absorbed glory hunter go out and kill the opposing army’s best warrior so all the other soldiers can go home. I nearly stood up and cheered when he finally died.
Pretty boy Orlando Bloom has become one of my favourite pieces of eye-candy thanks to “The Lord of the Rings”. He buckled his swash convincingly in “Pirates of the Caribbean” too. But here something has gone terribly wrong. As spoilt rich boy Paris he indulges in too much bad smell acting, content to wander around looking as though he’s caught a whiff of something nasty, rather than acting. For a character who’s supposed to be a playboy, he looks too comfortable with a sword and bow and too uncomfortable with the idea of getting it on with Helen. Plus his transformation from fop to hero is a little too easy.
Eric Bana fairs somewhat better as Paris’ brother and protector Hector. He brings a weighty presence to the role, making the character both sympathetic and hard as nails. He’s one of the only likeable people in the whole film. So it’s a great shame when he gets killed off with almost three quarters of an hour to go and we’re left with a vacuum of charisma.
Brian Cox has played so many villains over the past few years that he’s in danger of becoming a parody of himself. His Agamemnon is menacing and capricious, but it’s also a re-run of his Colonel Stryker role in “X-Men 2”. So if you haven’t seen that film he’s a perfectly acceptable bad guy here, but if you have seen it then you may feel like you’re paying money for old rope.
I’m not sure why Diane Kruger was cast as Helen, being neither a very good actress nor the most beautiful woman in the world. Her Helen comes across as vapid and self-absorbed and Kruger has all the acting talent of a piece of two by four.
Brendan Gleeson gives good villain as Helen’s cuckolded husband Menelaus, but he’s never given free enough reign because he’s playing second fiddle to Brian Cox, which is a shame. We also don’t see enough of him, but that’s the problem with having so many main characters.
Peter O’Toole is well past his best. The man who was Lawrence of Arabia is long past his prime as Priam and hasn’t enough presence to carry off the role of the king of Troy believably. A great actor he may have been, but maybe he should concentrate on writing his memoirs and enjoying his dotage while he can.
Sean Bean is a reliable character actor who is well cast as Odysseus, King of Ithaca and mythical adventurer. He brings gravitas and trustworthiness to the role and is a useful contrast to other self-interested Greeks. It’s a solid and dependable performance, which make me wonder why he’s had so few lead roles. Although working in an ensemble is seems to bring out the best in him.
Rose Byrne appears as Briseis, who seems to exist only as a plot device to cause strife between Achilles and Agamemnon, who both seek to claim her. It’s not a great performance, but it’s by no means a terrible one. Her career could go either way on the basis of this performance, but I’d be willing to give her another chance.
Saffron Burroughs turns up as Hector’s wife Andromache, but she has little to do other than hang around on the sidelines looking worried or crying. The majority of the supporting characters are played by solid character actors who you’ll swear you’ve seen somewhere before. But a hard core of decent support roles doesn’t make up for the failings of the stars.
With a better script, effects, score, editing, production values and a different director, this could have been an epic to savour. As it is, it is a tangled mish-mash of disparate parts that never manages to rise above the mediocre. I wouldn’t advise that you rush out to see it, but if you really want to, I’d take a pillow (so you can sleep through the interminable final half-hour) and some very low expectations so you don’t leave the cinema feeling as disappointed as I did. Never have I been so tempted to walk out of a film so many times during a single showing. Still the costumes and jewellery are great and Orlando Bloom is pretty…
How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines
Production Year: 2002 - Action/Adventure - Director: Vincenzo Natali - Original Language: English - Classification: 15 years and over - Starring:Lucy Liu, David Hewlett, Anne Marie Scheffler, Joseph Scoren, Matthew Sharp, Jeremy Northam
Production Year: 1964 - Action/Adventure - Director: Cyril Endfield - Original Language: English - Classification: Parental Guidance - Starring:Stanley Baker, Jack Hawkins, Ulla Jacobsson, James Booth, Michael Caine, Nigel Green
Just finished watching it tonight... Brad Pitt, what do you ladies see in him. Over-hyped, over-paid and thankfully still over there. This movie reminded me too much of The Last Samurai --- with the maverick hero that just refuses to die... and with the compulsory crying scene for the hero -- allbeit at the end... ho hum what a disappointment to a Greek masterpiece. Sun
purplelynne 21.08.2004 23:10
I thought this film was dreaful and that Brad Pitt was totally miscast. Enjoyed watching Eric Bana in a skirt though - nice legs. The rest of the film was dire.Lynne x
jonesri 20.08.2004 09:57
I quite enjoyed the film although I am not sure I could sit through it again. Some parts are really badly done. Rich
There are many reasons to recommendTroyas a good ol' fashioned Hollywood epic, especially ... more
if you've never read Homer's The Iliad. Dispensing with Greek gods altogether, this earnestly massive production (budgeted at upwards of $200 million) will surely...
Postage & Packaging: £1.21 Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days...
For honour... In 1193B.C. the dandy Trojan prince Paris (Bloom) irresponsibly spirits ... more
away the unhappy wife of Menelaus (Gleeson) the Spartan king. Demanding the return of Helen the Greeks launch a thousand ships and lay siege to Troy. Under the com...
Postage & Packaging: £0.00 Availability: 3-5 working days
Advantages: Fantastic cinematography, Great acting by Bana and Pitt especially, Gripping battle sequences Disadvantages: Bloom and Bean's performances are flawed , Slightly over-long
Advantages: Fantastic cinematography, Great acting by Bana and Pitt especially, Gripping battle sequences Disadvantages: Bloom and Bean's performances are flawed , Slightly over-long