I feel a bit of a fraud, did a hit and run with my first review in ages, came back a month later and...
I feel a bit of a fraud, did a hit and run with my first review in ages, came back a month later and you've given me a diamond. I should get back into this, I've been so lazy recently your generous accolade could be just the encouragement I needed. Zx
Member since:04.07.2000
Reviews:89
Members who trust:79
‘The Village’ is being marketed incorrectly. I’m sure you’ve seen the trailers, yellow capes, red capes, monsters in the woods, “don’t let them in” – that sort of thing – and probably thought that this was a horror film. It’s not. In fact ‘The Village’ is a strange little film pitched somewhere between a period drama and the twilight zone and if you go see it expecting a horror film you will be disappointed. Let’s hope this review may spare you such disappointment because ‘The Village’ is not a bad film, it’s just a bit of a silly one.
Somewhere outside Philadelphia is an isolated village deep in the middle of Covington Woods. The villagers have an uneasy truce with ‘those we do not speak of’ a group of monsters who live in the woods and look something like a cross between an armadillo and a porcupine – oh and they wear red capes (no self respecting monster walks around naked in the late 1800s). The Village elders (including William Hurt and Sigourney Weaver) assure the younger villagers that as long as they don’t go into the woods ‘those we do not speak of’ will not enter the village. That is until livestock starts getting skinned and overnight red marks appear on the town’s doors.
Alright so that plot synopsis may sound like a horror film (though not a particularly good one) but I assure you it isn’t. In fact the most interesting elements of the story have nothing to do with monsters. The most engaging is the love story between Lucius Hunt (Joaquin Phoenix) and Ivy Walker (Bryce Dallas
Howard). M. Night Shyamalan was inspired to write ‘The Village’ after being asked to direct a new version of ‘Wuthering Heights’ he declined the offer but after reading the book felt compelled to write his own period piece. The inspiration works hugely well in Ivy and Lucius’ romance which is sweet, funny, passionate, moving and above all believable. It is by far the best thing in the film and indeed if the film was sold as a romance there would no doubt be far less disappointment as the crowds file out of the multiplex. In fact as a period piece in general the film is very successful; creating a realistic tone and keeping a strong sense of humour (people did laugh in the 19th century) it is an interesting study of an isolated way of life. Unfortunately this is not the focus of the film.
Being the writer/director of ‘The Sixth Sense’ has proved to be a mixed blessing for M. Night Shyamalan. It has brought him critical and popular acclaim which with it brings bigger budgets and cinematic free reign. With this free reign Shyamalan has chosen to give us ‘Unbreakable’, ‘Signs’ and now ‘The Village’ and though the twists are less prevalent in the middle two films, with ‘The Village’ we are right back in “must see twice” territory. If Shyamalan is not careful he is going to be remembered as a poor man’s Hitchcock (yes he does cameo in the film) who had one good idea and milked a career out of it. The difference between the ‘The Sixth Sense’ and ‘The Village’ is in the former the twist is satisfying, appropriate and stands up to scrutiny in the latter it is ridiculous, obvious and leaves you with more questions than answers. If we try to ignore the twist however much of Shyamalan’s script is very good the dialogue is witty and emotive, characters are rounded and the earlier semi-twist is deftly executed and highly successful; but the end still sucks.
As a mood piece the film does work very well and this is where Shyamalan‘s direction deserves credit. Roger Deakins cinematography is stunning working with a rich palette of autumnal hues to create a feeling of warmth, purity and security (one which is shattered by a later switch in styles). Colour plays a very important role in the plot (though one which is never satisfactorily resolved) and red (the bad colour) and yellow are used to great visual effect much like Shyamalan used red in the sixth sense. The village itself is a very real place which feels solid (though not convincingly self sufficient) Production Designer Tom Foden succeeding in making the village a concrete and authentic place full of attention to detail. The costumes are beautiful and subtle and the same can be said for hair and make-up. Even though they sound ridiculous ‘those we do not speak of’ are a masterful piece of design unlike any monster previously seen on screen and the red capes give them a particularly spooky fairytale quality. Generally this is a very well designed and shot film.
Performances too deserve praise. When Shyamalan saw Bryce Dallas Howard in a Broadway show and cast her without audition he discovered a star. Though considering her father is Richie Cunningham (sorry I mean acclaimed director Ron Howard) it was probably only a matter of time. She is beautiful (though not in a Hollywood way) and has impressively natural quality to her performance which sees her at turns being funny, dramatic and convincingly (and movingly) emotional – and her godfather is the Fonz. Joaquin Phoenix is as usual fantastic, slowly rising from the shadow of his brother, Phoenix has put in great performance after great performance. The role of Lucius Hunt was written for him and hence is full of the brooding and hidden depths which Phoenix first mastered back in Parenthood (when he was directed by his co-star’s Dad), he is magnificent and I’ve said it before but he’s the next De Niro. William Hurt is saddled with a less than appealing character but does brilliantly with what he’s given. Sigourney Weaver is woefully underused and though Adrien Brody is over the top he gets away with it (just).
There is so much good in ‘The Village’ but it will always be outweighed by the contrived and questionable twist whish leaves an audience with nothing to talk about but plot holes. If you are very easily scared there are a few chills on offer and though the twist is very heavily signposted Shyamalan manages a few jumps and jolts before the final reveal, unfortunately they are entirely dissipated by the Scooby Doo ending. The film should leave you with questions about the nature of isolation, society and what you would be willing to sacrifice to ensure your family’s safety. Unfortunately what you’ll actually be left saying is “What?” and though there are few plot chasms I can point out without ruining the plot I can ask you whether you think sending blind people into densely wooded unfamiliar areas is a good idea or whether you would stand idly by as your only child laid dying despite being able to save him because of a promise you made. No? Me neither.
I hope Shyamalan has the courage to move away from his love of pulling the rug from under audiences in his next film. Like many writer/directors (yes Tarantino I’m talking to you) you can help feel that Shyamalan has surrounded himself with yes men and needs someone who’ll tell him honestly when his ideas are ridiculous and hire a decent editor because even at a relatively brief 108 minutes the film really lags in places. That said if you like period films or are easily impressed by jokes with ludicrous punch lines then you’ll enjoy this film.
And I got through the whole thing without telling you that Bruce Willis is dead – oh hang on, wrong movie…
How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines
Production Year: 2002 - Horror - Director: Danny Boyle - Original Language: English - Classification: 18 years and over - Starring: Cillian Murphy, Megan Burns, Noah Huntley, Christopher Eccleston, Marvin Campbell, Brendan Gleeson
Production Year: 1984 - Horror - Director: Joe Dante - Original Language: English - Classification: 15 years and over - Starring: Zach Galligan, Phoebe Cates, Hoyt Axton, Polly Holliday, Frances Lee McCain, Judge Reinhold, Corey Feldman
Looked for a review as it was on the telly tonight. An exceptional review...eiley
moo-cow 22.10.2005 17:51
One of those films where all the good bits are shown in the trailer, making it look better than it really is. I enjoyed it, but was very disappointed by it, if you know what I mean. Anyway, great review. Enjoyed reading it. :)
n13roy 01.04.2005 11:09
Great Title....In fact I think The Village People scare me more than this film did.....Great review on a very disappointing film as far as I am concerned. The trailers promised a much better film.....Roy
Even when his trademark twist-ending formula wears worrisomely thin as it does inThe ... more
Village, M. Night Shyamalan is a true showman who knows how to serve up a spookfest. He's derailed this time by a howler of a "surprise" lifted almost directly from "A...
Postage & Packaging: £1.21 Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days...
Even when his trademark twist-ending formula wears worrisomely thin as it does inThe ... more
Village, M. Night Shyamalan is a true showman who knows how to serve up a spookfest. He's derailed this time by a howler of a "surprise" lifted almost directly from "A...
Postage & Packaging: Free! Availability: Usually dispatched within 24 hours...
Run. The truce is ending. M. Night Shyamalan's 'The Village' finds the renowned ... more
writer-director crafting a suspenseful story of a small community whose inhabitants are plagued by fear of the unknown forest that surrounds them. For years they have kep...
Postage & Packaging: £0.00 Availability: 3-5 working days
From Academy Award-nominated writer, director and modern-day master of suspense M. Night ... more
Shyamalan (Nominee: Best Director, Best Original Screenplay, The Sixth Sense, 1999), THE VILLAGE is a riveting, edge-of-your-seat chiller with a stellar ensemble c...