Sorry Ciao, but really not impressed with the new site (which seems to come and go?)
Sorry Ciao, but really not impressed with the new site (which seems to come and go?)
Member since:08.12.2005
Reviews:99
Members who trust:51
I've been meaning to see this film for quite some time but only ever seeming to catch the ending! Then finally I spotted it on Sky and decided to give it a go, since it was just me watching telly.
Story
Jack Nicholson plays Jack, who has taken on a job as a hotel caretaker for the winter months and moves with his wife, Wendy and son, Danny to this huge hotel in the middle of nowhere. He is warned that things will get lonely, but as he is a writer, he is only too keen to have a bit of time to himself. However, he doesn't come prepared for the amount of solitary time he will have, and as the time goes by, he starts to withdraw and become hostile to his own wife. His son has some sort of psychic powers that tell him something terrible happened in the hotel, and something terrible could happen again. As Jack loses his sanity and his son see ghosts around the hotel, will he and his mum be able to stay safe in the hotel until the end of the contract in May?
The film is based on a Stephen King novel and has become one of the classics. I really wanted to know what all the fuss was about. I don't think it would really be fair to compare a film like this, made in 1980, with today's standards. The style back then was clearly different, and the emphases was more on creating an atmosphere and ideas that would stick in people's minds. For instance, in The Exorcist, the thing that made it effective was saying that people who believed in possession were vulnerable to it, then trying to convince us of how real it is, so that you come out trying to convince everyone that you think it's nonsense but at the back of your mind you wonder "what if". In The Shining it was about how being isolated could drive you so mad that you could become a psycho killer within months and hurt people you would normally never dream of hurting. Admittedly there was in implication
that Jack Torrance was susceptible to violence as he had previously attacked his son, yet he seems to have wiped the slate clean and become a proper family man.
I think today a lot (not all) of films tend to need big groups of people who drop like flies, dying horrific deaths that the remaining survivors often witness and the emphasis on how gory the film can be. Obviously I wouldn't want to give away if anyone was killed in The Shining, who or how many people if so, but it is clear that in this remote place where it is only Jack and his family the number of potential deaths is small, although the already dead count is a bit bigger. Much of the film is more about drawing out the onset of psychosis and Jack's increasingly strange behaviour. I liked this film because it was different to most of the films I've seen lately, which are starting to feel like clones, even if they are good! The idea of being stuck out there in the middle of nowhere with only two other people is probably the only thing that gives me the creeps, but that was effective enough.
Acting/Characters
Jack Nicholson was chosen for the part of Jack Torrance, over Robert De Niro and Robin Williams, apparently being just psychotic enough without going overboard. This seems to be his best type of film, as I remember being really impressed with his performance in One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest - a film where he pretends to be crazy to get out of doing time.
I don't think it is Shelley Duvall's fault at all, but I really hated her character and the way it was done. It sounds like Kubrick insisted on having an actress who would play a feeble woman for Jack's wife, who was really quite helpless. In those days maybe this would have been a more likely option, so maybe this is just another outdated element of the film, but where I couldn't relate to her at all it was impossible to care what happened to her or to picture myself in her shoes, which I like to be able to do. I think today a lot of people would look at Wendy, and in some scenes just think "you flimsy bitch, just stop your faffing and wack Jack!" I think it was a tough role to play, but it would have been better if the character had a bit of strength in her.
Now, according to some Wiki notes (sorry, I don't mean to rely on it!) Danny Lloyd, who plays the child, Danny Torrance, was not even aware that he was acting in a horror movie! He just had that stare that was somewhere between fear and curiousity and looked very convincing. I just can't believe he didn't know! He was really good and quite genuine for a little child wondering around a massive hotel on his own, getting scared of the things you would be scared of at that age, yet probably a lot of people feel scared for his situation irrespective of age (but not me!).
Scatman Crothers was also really good in this film, and I was surprised to realise that he was actually 70 when this film was made. He looked 50 at the most to me! His character was a bit strange but I think this made the film more interesting. He shares an ability with Danny and so although their meeting is brief and you could hardly call it a friendship he helps to alleviate the isolated feeling just slightly, albeit temporarily. I think the film would have just been depressing if it had been constantly just the three main characters and never getting to know anyone else.
Film qualities
Obviously everything is a little outdated in this film so we can't expect what we might today. I mean, you only have to look at the dreadful wallpaper in some of the hotel rooms. That's fitting for a horror movie! Everything looks a bit more 'real', though, which is something I do quite like about the film, and the limitations are not too bad. There is a scene of blood gushing through from a lift, which is repeated several times in the film and I did not really get the significance of this but it was impressive. There is some gore in the film and although it is vague and shown very quickly it looks quite real.
The soundtrack is also terribly dated and there are a few places where the sounds are so high pitched I almost covered my ears and had to grab the remote control and bring down the volume a few notches! I do think, however, that where the soundtrack wasn't so squealy, it played a good part in what probably made the film so scary to people (not me, of course! ;-)). The sounds gradually get more and more sinister and the build up in each scene is incredible. Yes, there's a lot I'd change in that if the film were made today, but for what it is, it is brilliant.
The film was reclassified as a 15 in 2007, and I don't really know what the original classification was but would assume it has been brought down from an 18. I think older films generally did have much higher ratings than they would today. 15 is spot on, in my opinion, given the sorts of films people watch today! The film does have nudity, arguably a sexual scene, and obviously plenty of violence. There was swearing, but actually I have to admit a few times I had to think if I'd just heard the F word! Although there is a child in the film, remember, I don't think he even knew that and I'm sure he would not really have been exposed to the horrible scenes he is meant to have seen! So this is definitely not a film for kids and I'd doubt if many kids would appreciate it anyway.
Conclusion
I hope I have convinced you that while I did not find this film scary in the least bit there is a chance that other people will. In fact it has been rated quite highly on scary factors. But whether or not you get scared, I think it is well worth watching this film just because it is a classic and you can say you've seen it! It is a bit long (run time about 2 hours cut), and seems longer than the actual run time, but if you can stick it out it might be worthwhile just to know what happens. I probably would be able to sit through this film again, maybe once, but I doubt I will. I would recommend you rent the DVD rather than buy it, or look out for it on the digital channels if you have them!
How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines
Production Year: 1980 - Horror - Director: Paul Lynch - Original Language: English - Classification: 18 years and over - Starring: Jamie Lee Curtis, Leslie Nielsen, Casey Stevens, Anne-Marie Martin, Antoinette Bower
Production Year: 2000 - Horror - Director: Keenen Ivory Wayans - Original Language: English - Classification: 18 years and over - Starring: Carmen Electra, Anna Faris, Kurt Fuller, James Van Der Beek, Keenen Ivory Wayans
Recovering alcoholic Jack Torrance (Jack Nicholson) gets a job as caretaker at the ... more
deserted Overlook Hotel during the winter. He takes up residence with his wife, Wendy, and son, Danny, who experiences clairvoyant forebodings. As the bleak isolation of...
Stanley Kubrick'sThe Shiningis less an adaptation of Stephen King's best-selling horror ... more
novel than a complete re-imagining of it from the inside out. In King's book, the Overlook Hotel is a haunted place that takes possession of its off-season caretake...
Postage & Packaging: Free! Availability: Usually dispatched within 24 hours...
Stanley Kubrick'sThe Shiningis less an adaptation of Stephen King's best-selling horror ... more
novel than a complete re-imagining of it from the inside out. In King's book, the Overlook Hotel is a haunted place that takes possession of its off-season caretake...
Postage & Packaging: Free! Availability: Usually dispatched within 24 hours...
Think of the greatest terror imaginable. Is it a monstrous alien? A lethal epidemic? Or ... more
as in this harrowing masterpiece from Stanley Kubrick is it fear of murder by someone who should love and protect you - a member of your own family? From a sc...
Postage & Packaging: £0.00 Availability: 3-5 working days