Thank you for all your lovely comments. I'm taking an extended break from Ciao due to pressures from...
Thank you for all your lovely comments. I'm taking an extended break from Ciao due to pressures from work and home. Feel free to drop me from your COT if you're feeling neglected. You're all great writers and I'm gonna miss you! xxxx
Member since:14.05.2003
Reviews:54
Members who trust:25
In my experience, there are two rules about comic book adaptations: 1. They have to be bigger and better and more expensive than the last, and 2. They have to be loud, brash and totally unrealistic.
It is normally 2 that backfires on people. Loud, brash and unrealistic works sometimes, for example in the X-men franchise, of which I am a huge fan. However, sometimes, it goes completely wrong, as with (so I’m told, I haven’t sampled its delights myself yet) The Avengers, when loud brash and unrealistic turns into annoying, farcical and over-indulged.
Q: Name two things The Avengers and The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen have in common? A: They both star Sean Connery, and they both fall into the second category.
I’m not saying that The League…should never have been made, I’m just saying that whoever’s bright idea it was to turn the novel by Alan Moore and Kevin O’Neill should quite possibly by hanging on to their job by the skin of their pearly whites.
It’s just so implausible! A masked villain (oh, puhlease!) going by the moniker of ‘The Fantom’ is terrorising Europe, stealing weapons of ultimate destruction (well, for 1899 anyway – later on in the film it appears that a motor car is so fast it can save the world) trying to start a war so that he can become rich beyond his wildest dreams as an arms-dealer. The British government decide that he needs to be stopped and recruit Allan Quatermain (Connery) to lead a League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (and one rather annoying lady) to fight evil and save the world. Da-da-da-da-da!
This is perhaps where the film first stumbles. The plot is fine for a novel, where (I haven’t read it so I’m only assuming) the descriptions might work written down, but this has been done so many times before! An evil supervillain tries to take over the world, so seven
men and women with superpowers try to stop him, oh how original! The whole story seems contrived and difficult to follow, and the multiple explosions and clunky dialogue make it hard to care about what’s going on.
The excess of leading characters also means that you don’t care about what’s happening to our heroes. The obvious main character is Connery’s Quatermain, but his acting is so bad that you are just waiting for his end. ‘I was told that Africa would never let me die’ he says, and a groan of annoyance rippled around the cinema. I know people go on about how Connery was the best Bond, and maybe he was, but is it me, or is his accent – and acting – getting steadily worse as his films go on? He now slurs his words in a Scottish mish-mash of broken vowels and swallowed consonants, throwing in a ‘blohey’ (pretty sure he means ‘bloody’) in now and again. He sounds like he’s doing an impression of Bobby Davro doing an impression of him, and it really doesn’t work.
The character, too, of Quatermain, is also annoyingly underdeveloped. A boring sub-plot about how he didn’t train his son properly and sent him to his death just takes up screen time and what might have been sympathetic ends up contrived and over-indulged.
There is also no reason for Connery, as the lovely ruth_cole pointed out, to be the leader. It is Captain Nemo’s (Nasreeruddin Shah) boat they travel on, and he is a Captain, so why wasn’t he in charge? He is the one who gives most of the orders, especially when they are on the boat (‘it travels in water if that’s what you mean…and under it!’) While Nemo is a bit bland, - the attempt to spice his character up by pointing out that he worships the goddess of death falls flat on its face - he is not half as offensive as Quatermain whose endless quips make for cringe-worthy viewing.
Stuart Townsend’s Dorian Grey, the immortal, was probably the most interesting character. Surly Townsend carried off Grey’s one-liners (after being shot several times and not dying he replies ‘I’m complicated’ to the question ‘who are you?’) with humorous aplomb and camp expressions, sword-twirling galore. My friend fell in love with him half way through the film, and, while I can’t say the same myself, he did keep things semi-interesting while he was on screen.
I can’t quite work out why they threw Dr Jekyll/Mr Hyde (Jason Flemyng) in there, apart from the fact that it might have given the film some integrity; having nervous Jekyll battling with his monstrous ‘dark side’…but this, too, didn’t work. This was probably down to the fact that the CGI-enhanced Hyde looked like The Hulk’s younger brother, with his tiny little legs and grossly fat torso. Every time he came on screen I had to stifle an urge to laugh.
The Invisible man, while in the book (I think, anyway) was the original Invisible man, in this film is a petty thief who stole the formula. Tony Curran’s Rodney Skinner did elicit some laughs from me, but ultimately had little screen time and his actions confused me. Why, when in one scene he had a big of white face paint over the front of his face, did he, in the next scene, appear completely covered in it, right to the back of his head? Surely he’d miss a spot? And how did he carry it about in the snow when he was, allegedly, naked? More to the point, how did he survive? And on that note (I could go on forever, here) why weren’t the rest of the cast freezing or even shivering whilst wearing nothing but fur coats and no hats in the middle of a blizzard?
While Connery was the worst actor by far on screen, I really had little time for Peta Wilson, playing vampiress Mina Harker, who, apparently, did get bitten by old Dracula after her husband died. Wilson’s dry English accent made her sound (intentionally or not) like she was very bored, or slowly dying. Example: when there is a big explosion, Harker drawls with half-closed eyes, ‘Ohhhhhh, I was afraid something terrrrrible had happened’. She also didn’t appear in the least bit attractive and I couldn’t understand why every guy on board apart from Nemo and Quatermain, was lusting after her. Even Hyde, who tries to convince his alter ego Jekyll to take the formula with the ingenious line ‘she never even looks at you – when you were me she looked at you’. Yup, maybe that was because you were seven-foot-tall and wearing a bulky fat suit.
Another gripe with Mina was why her hair was perfectly curled when she was the Fantom’s castle, when in the previous scene it hadn’t been, and between then and now she’d been outside in the snow and flying through the gate as a bat. How?
My personal favourite was Tom Sawyer (Shane West). Completely adorable with his floppy hair and gorgeous accent, I forgot about the fact that Sawyer had no dark past, and no special powers apart from being American. Indeed, he seemed to be only in the League because he gave Quatermain a gun, and the film because Quatermain needed someone to work out his father/son issues with. However, I thought that West played his part admirably, bringing to life the eager-to-please, love-struck Sawyer. I couldn’t work out why Mina Harker chose snarling, camp Grey over him – apart from the fact that she was a vampire – ‘you’re young and sweet…neither are qualities I rate highly’.
However, though the majority of the cast do try, the terrible, clunky dialogue and bad special effects let the film down horribly. The submarine/boat thing of Nemo’s really annoyed me, because although it was absolutely massive, no one ever spotted it and it seemed to dart through the narrow Venetian canals and in and out of the water like a small fish. The start of the film, where the Fantom’s tanks crash through London, felt like it was being done on a deserted, cardboard set that had seen better days, which, I’m sure, it was.
The fact that all of the characters – apart from Sawyer, who was, admittedly, a little underdeveloped – an aura of mystery around them, as you could expect, made it quite obvious that there was going to be some kind of traitor. However, despite the way they all suspect Skinner, hammering it down every few minutes to fool you, even from the outset its quite clear who it is. I won’t spoil it for you, although maybe I should, and it’ll persuade you not to view this extraordinary monstrosity.
Although in some other people’s ops the direction was praised, I hardly noticed it to be honest, while revelling in the manure that was the plot, the dialogue and the acting. Some of the camera work, especially when they are on the submarine boat, is impressive, but nothing inspired. Surely a better director would have elicited better performances from his cast?
So there you have it – mixed acting, wooden dialogue, terrible plot, bad special effects. Hands up who can guess how many stars I’m going to give THIS film?
Thanks for reading!
How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines
Production Year: 1964 - Action/Adventure - Director: Cyril Endfield - Original Language: English - Classification: Parental Guidance - Starring:Stanley Baker, Jack Hawkins, Ulla Jacobsson, James Booth, Michael Caine, Nigel Green
Production Year: 2002 - Action/Adventure - Director: Vincenzo Natali - Original Language: English - Classification: 15 years and over - Starring:Lucy Liu, David Hewlett, Anne Marie Scheffler, Joseph Scoren, Matthew Sharp, Jeremy Northam
Production Year: 1977 - Action/Adventure - Director: Clint Eastwood - Original Language: English - Classification: 18 years and over - Starring:Clint Eastwood, Sondra Locke, Pat Hingle, William Prince, Bill McKinney
I think you've been a little harsh on this film! The very things that you disliked were what I liked about it (the implausible ship and car, the random selection of characters.) I guess you just have suspend belief to watch these comic book adaptations. I agree it's a bit cheesy though, but not half as bad as the matrix...! Jo
philipjohn001 17.11.2003 18:48
Great op - now i'll wait for the pirate version...;o) Phil
The heroes of 1899 are brought to life with the help of some expensive special effects ... more
inThe League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. From the pages of Victorian literature come Captain Nemo, Dr Jekyll (and his alter ego Mr Hyde), Dorian Gray, Tom Sawyer, th...
Postage & Packaging: £1.21 Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days...
The heroes of 1899 are brought to life with the help of some expensive special effects ... more
inThe League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. From the pages of Victorian literature come Captain Nemo, Dr Jekyll (and his alter ego Mr Hyde), Dorian Gray, Tom Sawyer, th...
Postage & Packaging: £1.21 Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days...
The heroes of 1899 are brought to life with the help of some expensive special effects ... more
inThe League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. From the pages of Victorian literature come Captain Nemo, Dr Jekyll (and his alter ego Mr Hyde), Dorian Gray, Tom Sawyer, th...
Postage & Packaging: Free! Availability: Usually dispatched within 24 hours...
THE LEAGUE OF EXTRAORDINARY GENTLEMEN:A hunter, a scientist, a vampire, an invisible man, ... more
an immortal, a spy, a beast ... When a masked madman known as 'The Fantom' threatens to launch global Armageddon, legendary adventurer Allan Quatermain commands a...