I can see people's ratings! Could ciao have actually fixed something?
I can see people's ratings! Could ciao have actually fixed something?
Member since:05.05.2005
Reviews:962
Members who trust:374
Gotham City is experiencing yet another crime wave at the hands of the mafia and the Joker, who are intent to turn Gotham into a free-for-all for criminals. New District Attorney, Harvey Dent, is determined to get to the bottom of matters, along with James Gordon and Bruce Wayne, who leads a double life as Batman. Some progress is made, but the Joker keeps turning up and thwarting their every move. Can Batman rid the city of the menace that the Joker has become? Or is the Joker's psychopathic nature finally going to turn the tables on Batman and law enforcement in Gotham for good?
I should note right here that I usually stay well clear of superhero films. They never have appealed to me, and apart from the Batman series that was on the television in the seventies, I have never seen Batman in action. However, with Heath Ledger's death earlier this year and the rave reviews that I have read, I decided to go against the grain and see what everyone was talking about. This is, then, a review about the film as a stand-alone, because I cannot comment on how this fits in or compares with previous films.
The first thing that stands out with this film is that it should have been called The Joker and not The Dark Knight. As the Joker, Heath Ledger really does take over the film. I have been critical of his acting in the past (I didn't think much of him in A Knight's Tale, for example), but here he is fantastically evil and menacing. The make-up, I must admit, does help - it is no doubt carefully but messily applied and turns the scars at the edge of his lips into one big red smile. However, it is his whole body language
and the way that he moves his mouth that makes him so successful in his role. He manages to lick and smack his lips in such a way that he seems really psychopathic, and, although I'm used to watching portrayals of evil nutters, this one was up there with the best of them. His death has no doubt increased sales and popular acclaim for the film, but I think the praise that he has garnered is unreservedly deserved. What a way to go out.
I was less impressed by Christian Bale as Batman. As Bruce Wayne, he is a smooth operator who came across to me as smarmy rather than charming - not ideal in someone that is supposed to be a hero, albeit as his alter ego. As Batman, he irritated the hell out of me with the silly voice he adopted. He deepened his voice for a start, which sounded daft enough, but then he also adopted a weird kind of lisp - I'm not sure if it was because the bat mask was pinching his nose or something - but whatever it was, I found it off-putting and found myself intent on his mouth and the way it moved rather than what was coming out of it. I'm not all that familiar with Christian Bale, but must admit I want to see him in other roles to compare it with this - certainly in this one, I wasn't all that impressed.
I was also slightly disappointed with Maggie Gyllenhaal as Rachel - Howard Dent's girlfriend and the love of Bruce's life - although that is perhaps a little unfair - women characters in boy's comics do tend to be pretty nondescript and that is exactly what she is. A shame, because I think she is a very fine actress. No doubt it will do her CV a lot of good though. Aaron Eckhart as Harvey Dent is good, if a little too perfect at the beginning. He really begins to get in the swing of things towards the end though and his wonderful two faced look is a joy to see (that's sarcasm - it's disgusting). Gary Oldman is also good as Gordon, although I wish he'd got rid of the annoying moustache! As it is, I didn't recognise him until I saw the credits at the end. Michael Caine and Morgan Freeman are highly billed and so deserve a mention, but to be honest, they weren't really on-screen for long enough to make a deep impression on me.
My main problem with this film is the length. At well over two hours, it was way too long for me. This is definitely a film that is best seen on the big screen, but when my bum goes numb after an hour, I start to fidget. And for the last hour of the film, I was beginning to lose the will to live - I certainly didn't care whether Batman did or not. Unfortunately too, the last part of the film is the most complicated and needs the most concentration, so I'm not fully sure I understood everything that was going on. Nor did I like the film enough to want to go and see it again to follow up on the loose ends.
You've probably heard about the violence in the film whether you've seen it or not and there is a lot of debated about whether 12A is an appropriate classification. I don't have children and don't intend to dictate to parents whether or not their children should be allowed to watch this. However, I will say that it is incredibly violent and I am someone that watches horror/thriller films on a regular basis - some films classified as 18 contain less violence than this. I think they have got away with the low classification because much of the violence doesn't show the end product - for example, when the Joker shoves a pencil in someone's head, we don't see it go in or the messy bits afterwards. Personally, I think showing the gore might have been better and more off-putting to children than not - the way it is portrayed in the film it seems almost too cool. Anyway, my point is, educate yourself about the film before you decide whether anyone under 12 should watch it.
The special effects are absolutely incredible and it is well worth going to see at the cinema to get the full impact. They are relentless and certainly give the impression that every attention to detail has been thought of. At times they went over my head - I didn't fully understand, for example, what all the screens Morgan Freeman's character was staring at towards the end were all about - but heck, they looked good and I'm sure will appeal enormously to geeks. I would think that younger children would struggle to understand the intricacies of the plot, but the action will no doubt make up for that.
There has been much talk about the Nolan brothers' screenplay and how good it is. Not knowing much about previous films or the original Batman comics, I don't know how accurate it is, but I will say that for the first hour of the film, I enjoyed the screenplay. Unfortunately, for the last part of the film, I found it less enjoyable, but how much of that was a decrease in the quality of the screenplay and how much was the drawing out of the plot I am not sure. I personally don't think it was all that wonderful - certainly not the extraordinary quality that I had been expecting from critics.
I'm boringly on the fence with this film. I loved Heath Ledger's performance and lived for his appearance on the screen - without it, I honestly think that I would have walked out before the end. And the film is incredibly well-made. But it was way too long for me and, frankly, it is not a genre that I am at all fond of, nor am the target audience for it. I know a lot of people will disagree, but this is my opinion, so, sorry, Bat fans! I do think it is worth watching though, if only to make your own mind up after all the hype and to see Ledger's Joker. If you can watch it in the comfort of your own home with surround sound and a large screen, that might be better than the cinema though - at least then you can switch off and have a break if it starts to drag. Recommended, with reservations.
The DVD can be pre-ordered from play.com, but there is currently no mention of price.
Classification: 12A
Running time: 152 minutes
How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines
Production Year: 2003 - Action/Adventure - Director: The Wachowski Brothers - Original Language: English - Classification: 15 years and over - Starring:Keanu Reeves, Laurence Fishburne, Carrie-Anne Moss, Hugo Weaving, Jada Pinkett Smith, Monica Bellucci
Production Year: 2002 - Action/Adventure - Director: Vincenzo Natali - Original Language: English - Classification: 15 years and over - Starring:Lucy Liu, David Hewlett, Anne Marie Scheffler, Joseph Scoren, Matthew Sharp, Jeremy Northam
Production Year: 1964 - Action/Adventure - Director: Cyril Endfield - Original Language: English - Classification: Parental Guidance - Starring:Stanley Baker, Jack Hawkins, Ulla Jacobsson, James Booth, Michael Caine, Nigel Green
The Dark Knightarrives with tremendous hype (best superhero movie ever? posthumous Oscar ... more
for Heath Ledger?), and incredibly, it lives up to all of it. But calling it the best superhero movie ever seems like faint praise, since part of what makes the mo...
Postage & Packaging: £1.21 Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days...
The Dark Knightarrives with tremendous hype (best superhero movie ever? posthumous Oscar ... more
for Heath Ledger?), and incredibly, it lives up to all of it. But calling it the best superhero movie ever seems like faint praise, since part of what makes the mo...
Postage & Packaging: Free! Availability: Usually dispatched within 24 hours...
Following on from Batman Begins director Christopher Nolan and Christian Bale reunite for ... more
The Dark Knight. With the help of Lieutenant Jim Gordon and newly appointed District Attorney Harvey Dent Batman sets out to dismantle the remaining criminal o...
Postage & Packaging: £0.00 Availability: 3-5 working days
Advantages: Picture, sound, story, characters, cast etc etc etc Disadvantages: changes from full to wide screen Ion my ps3 dunno about actual blue ray player