If you've left me a rating on either my Imaginarium of Dr Parnassus or In the Valley of Elah reviews...
If you've left me a rating on either my Imaginarium of Dr Parnassus or In the Valley of Elah reviews, please let me know as they are showing up as 'not yet rated' even though at least fifteen of you have rated each one.
Member since:11.07.2000
Reviews:778
Members who trust:82
On 14th November 1975, Ronald DeFeo brutally murdered his entire family, claiming voices in the house drove him to it. A year later newlyweds George and Kathy Lutz move in with her three children. Shortly after George's mind begins to unravel as the house takes hold of him.
The random remake roundabout spins into action once more and spits out this bloody lump of recycled 70s schlock horror. Unsurprisingly it comes from Michael Bay's horror remake conveyor belt. This version of the 70s schlocker is unlikely to cause many grumbles from purists - the original was hardly a classic and this version is solid enough. Director Andrew Douglas sticks to the Bay template; so we get photogenic leads in peril with plenty of cheap shocks, nosebleed editing and visual gimmickry. Sadly this makes for a very predictable film that lacks suspense and is a little too clear on the reasons for George's mental instability - the house really is evil. That's fine if all you're looking for is a haunted house story, but a little "Turn of the Screw" ambiguity (is it supernatural or all in his head?) might have made for a more unsettling and interesting picture. What we get is slickly shot but nowhere near scary enough. Douglas' biggest mistake is omitting the psychological aspect of horror - it's not about what you see, it's what you don't that can be scariest. Instead he relies almost entirely on effects to frighten his audience, whether they are visual or aural. To be fair some of them are effective and atmospheric, with doors and windows opening simultaneously at set times, holy water reacting with the floor of the house like acid and plenty of creepy creaking, heavy breathing and
muted whispers emanating from the walls and air vents. Plus the director cannily changes the way the exterior of the house is shot throughout the film; changing it from pristine white and benign at the beginning to twilight grey and menacing at the end. However Douglas goes into effects overkill far too often. The intro is a grainy strobe-lit montage of Ronald Defeo shooting his family and though it's a bit freaky it feels overstated. Then when George discovers the grisly secret in the basement and subsequently goes a bit bonkers we're given an overdose of frenetic editing accompanied by lashings of claret and unwarranted gore. It doesn't help that the source of all evil looks very similar to the thing from "Jeepers Creepers" crossed with Meg Mucklebones from "Legend". Having a human embodiment of evil makes the whole concept of an evil house redundant. And having looked at the end result and realised it wasn't very scary, Douglas has added a load of orchestral spikes whenever something happens to make the audience jump - it works but it feels lazy and cheap.
The screenplay by Scott Kosar is based on the screenplay for the original film, which, in turn is based on a book by Jay Anson. As you might expect with such provenance, it's not terribly original. Nor is it very engrossing because Kosar has stripped it of any human interest. There is virtually no character development in the script - we are essentially presented with a toothy, all-American couple and their three photogenic kids, they move into the house and the dad goes nuts practically overnight. The "true" story has been stripped of realism and subverted into a generic horror movie. As a result, it doesn't matter how good the actors' performances are because they have so little to work with, so no matter how hard they try they feel like stock characters, from the loving mother to the local priest. The problem with a rewrite of any film from this period was always going to be a question of originality and though the dialogue sounds authentic, the situations have now been done so many times that when the big denouement about the house's grisly past comes around, it feels like a cliché. As do all of the set pieces and George Lutz's descent into madness. I mean there's even a sexy babysitter to contend with.
I have rarely if ever seen such a toothy screen couple as Ryan Reynolds and Melissa George. Seriously, you could go blind if you stared at their huge, perfect white teeth for long enough. In fact Reynolds enormous grin is the reason I set out to hate him. Sadly he has too much charm and screen presence to allow me to. He starts out the film as a warm and mischievous kind of guy, but his transition from ideal to mad dad is rushed so he's never truly menacing (and he looks like he's holding back so he doesn't scare his child co-stars), though he gives a surprisingly effective performance as a psychopath. Former "Home and Away" actress Melissa George gives a similarly warm and sympathetic turn as Kathy Lutz. It is an underwritten role that requires little more of her than to look scared on cue and she does it very well. However, she looks far too young to be the mother of a twelve year-old.
The child actors in the film are very good, in the main. Jesse James is particularly effective as eldest sibling Billy, on the cusp of teenage rebellion though not yet thoroughly evil. Chloe Mortez is your standard Hollywood blonde moppet and Jimmy Bennett is so high-pitched that sometimes only dogs can hear him. I'll be glad when he hits puberty, not only because his voice will drop but also because with any luck the onset of adolescent acne will render him unemployable. He gives a whole new meaning to the term squeaky clean. Isabel Conner is an unsettling presence as the ghost of Jodie Defeo, but that's more to do with her disturbing habit of appearing out of nowhere and her pallid and veiny face. Philip Baker Hall adds a touch of gravitas as local priest Father Callaway. Sadly he's not given much to do and is playing his standard authority figure so is wasted.
The effects throughout vary from the serviceable to the downright stupid. There are some nice uses of digital compositing in the scenes where Jodie's ghost is grabbed by a disembodied pair of arms. But the computer generated flies that swarm at a priest during an exorcism make him look like he's being attacked by flying raisins. The effects make-up is awful from Reynolds very obvious bloodshot contact lenses to Jodie's drawn on veins to the thing in the basement that looks like it's been made from plasticine and cheap latex. The best effects are the simplest, like the windows that open themselves and the doors that slam shut of their own accord. Sometimes the old ones are the best, though not when it comes to blood effects where the red stuff is way too watery to look real.
There is a tremendous amount of period detail in the film that reminds us of how lucky we are not to live in the seventies. From the smocking to the deafeningly loud shirts and ill-advised babydoll tops to mirrored headboards and Kiss posters it's all horrifying in a very different way. The overwhelming impression is that the entire decade was made of dark brown velour and corduroy.
The score by Steve Jablonsky is atmospheric and tries its best to create a sense of dread in the listener through its foreboding strings and windy soundscapes. The intro subverts eerie sirens and adds them to echoing, muted bsslines and throbbing drums to set the viewer's nerves on edge, it's a shame the rest of the movie can't live up to this intriguing opening.
This is a film that will scare the pants off any underage viewers who've snuck into a screening. However, it will be a huge disappointment to horror aficionados or anyone who's seen more than a couple of schlock movies before. Despite some sympathetic central performances, the film is too formulaic and hastily slapped together to frighten. It's an abortive attempt to keep a sub-genre alive and going to see it will only line producer Michael Bay's already bulging pockets. It's not a bad film it's just desperately mediocre.
How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines
Production Year: 2002 - Horror - Director: Danny Boyle - Original Language: English - Classification: 18 years and over - Starring: Cillian Murphy, Megan Burns, Noah Huntley, Christopher Eccleston, Marvin Campbell, Brendan Gleeson
Production Year: 1984 - Horror - Director: Joe Dante - Original Language: English - Classification: 15 years and over - Starring: Zach Galligan, Phoebe Cates, Hoyt Axton, Polly Holliday, Frances Lee McCain, Judge Reinhold, Corey Feldman
From Michael Bay, the producer of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, comes the true story of ... more
Amityville. In November 1974, a family of six was brutally murdered. Now, a year later, an unsuspecting young couple, George (Ryan Reynolds, Blade: Trinity, Van Wild...