... So they did the obvious thing, and reclaimed the Stone of Scone from Westminster Abbey and brought it home to Scotland.
A little bit of history to give you some context if you don't know: the Stone of Scone, also known as the Stone of Destiny, is the ancient coronation stone of the kings ... Read review
Production Year: 2002 - Action/Adventure - Director: Vincenzo Natali - Original Language: English - Classification: 15 years and over - Starring:Lucy Liu, David Hewlett, Anne Marie Scheffler, Joseph Scoren, Matthew Sharp, Jeremy Northam
Production Year: 1964 - Action/Adventure - Director: Cyril Endfield - Original Language: English - Classification: Parental Guidance - Starring:Stanley Baker, Jack Hawkins, Ulla Jacobsson, James Booth, Michael Caine, Nigel Green
Production Year: 1977 - Action/Adventure - Director: Clint Eastwood - Original Language: English - Classification: 18 years and over - Starring:Clint Eastwood, Sondra Locke, Pat Hingle, William Prince, Bill McKinney
Advantages: Good acting and storytelling Disadvantages: The making-of could have been better utilised
...obvious thing, and reclaimed the Stone of Scone from Westminster Abbey and brought it home to Scotland.
A little bit of history to give you some context if you don't know: the Stone of Scone, also known as the Stone of Destiny, is the ancient coronation stone of the kings of Scotland, traced as far back as the year 847. There are legends that prior to that it was used by the Dalriada kings. In 1296 the Stone was stolen from its home ... ...copies. Some claimed that the stone Edward stole was not the Stone of Scone, but a fake. Following the students reclamation of the Stone in 1950, there have been numerous claims that it was a fake that was returned, and the Stone which sat in Westminster Abbey (and now in Edinburgh Castle) was not the real one, which remained hidden in Scotland.
Stone of Destiny (2008) tells the true story of this adventure. It is based on the autobiographical ... more
It is a wonderful thing to be Scottish. But it hasn't always been. Going back centuries, we have been conquered, invaded, and oppressed. As recently as the 1950s, Scotland was referred to by England as North Britain. There was a fledgling movement wanting a parliament for Scotland, to give us our freedom and pride back, but a lot of Scots were made to feel like second class citizens and the Scottish National Party was still developing its ideology. Then along came a group of Glasgow University students who decided it was time to stop talking and start doing. So they did the obvious thing, and reclaimed the Stone of Scone from Westminster Abbey and brought it home to Scotland.
A little bit of history to give you some context if you don't know: the Stone of Scone, also known as the Stone of Destiny, is the ancient coronation stone of the kings of Scotland, traced as far back as the year 847. There are legends that prior to that it was used by the Dalriada kings. In 1296 the Stone was stolen from its home in Scone Abbey by Edward I (Edward Longshanks) and brought south to England. Since that it has been used for the coronations of English monarchs, and, since the Union of the Crowns, British monarchs.
Throughout the last 700 years there have been stories of copies. Some claimed that the stone Edward stole was not the Stone of Scone, but a fake. Following the students reclamation of the Stone in 1950, there have been numerous claims that it was a fake that was returned, and the Stone which sat in Westminster Abbey (and now in Edinburgh Castle) was not the real one, which remained hidden in Scotland.
Stone of Destiny (2008) tells the true story of this adventure. It is based on the autobiographical account by Ian Hamilton, the leader of the group, of their successful break in to the Abbey and the return to Scotland. This is a story that I, and I assume most Scots, have grown up knowing and loving, the day when someone finally did something and woke up the nation. And it really did wake up the nation - although it took another 45 years for the Stone to be formally returned to Scotland.
The film is very well acted and written, and the story runs almost exactly as the true story does, with little cinematic embellishment. It's a simple film, there is no Hollywood flair here - but then, it is a story of post war Britain, hardly a bright and cheery place. Two of my favourite Scottish actors feature in it - Robert Carlyle and Billy Boyd, and both are excellent. Carlyle has been continually excellent throughout his career, so I knew I was in for some good acting with him in the film. He plays the legendary John MacCormick, a frontrunner in the pursuit of devolution who brought a legal challenge against the Queen, along with Hamilton, over her title (great story, look it up). Carlyle brings a gravitas to the cast with his portrayal of MacCormick, and gives the group of students someone to look up to and keep them grounded. Carlyle has of course acted in a story about the Stone of Destiny before - check out the final episodes of Hamish MacBeth - so he was on familiar ground here!
The remainder of the cast is also very convincing, and even the Scottish accents of the non-Scots rarely slip! Kate Mara as Kay Matheson, the only girl in the group, is very good but her accent wavers now and then - its sticks with Scottish most of the time, but she has a few different regional inflections! Charlie Cox, who plays Hamilton, does a good job of portraying the intensity of his feelings for Scotland and his desire to take back the Stone. Hamilton's single-minded determination come across very well. The other two members of the group, Gavin Stuart and Alan Vernon, are played by Stephen McCole and Ciaron Kelly, both Scots. They had a brotherly relationship, and McCole and Kelly play this very well. I was amazed to learn when I watched the making-of feature on the DVD that this was Kelly's first film.
The music used in the film is absolutely right for the time and place setting. It is undoubtedly Scottish, ad predominantly traditional, but sometimes with a more modern twist than there would have been in the 1950s, so as to draw in viewers today.
On the whole, the locations look very much like 1950s Glasgow and London. There were some things I picked up that I may be completely wrong about - for example, the road markings on Westminster Bridge. They probably couldn't do anything about that, but I very much doubt it was marked the same in 1950 as it is today!
It was a low budget film, and in fact was part funded by grants, so despite a few minor quibbles which really don't matter I think it does exceptionally well on locations, sets, costumes etc. And to be honest, it doesn't need a large budget - it was mostly shot on location, including some in Westminster Abbey, which is almost unheard of. There is absolutely no need for effects. What could you add that isn't there already? Not much that I can think of.
When this was released, some newspapers denounced it as anti English, and nationalist sentimentality. Personally, I think that is nonsense. It is true to fact. It is historical. And it is absolutely not anti-English. The Scottish nationalist view has never been anti-English, and in fact Robert Carlyle states this in the making-of on the DVD - "It's not anti-English. It's pro-Scottish". That was what taking the Stone was about for those students, and that is what Scottish nationalism still stands for today. So please, don't avoid this because you think it will be all about hating the English - it absolutely is not. And certainly less so than Braveheart which was a huge success worldwide! Interestingly, also in the making-of feature, Charlie Cox, an Englishman, claims that after seeing Braveheart he wanted to be Scottish so that he could feel that passion!
I absolutely loved this film. Even though I knew the story, I still found myself on the edge of my seat worrying about them getting caught or failing. There was some gentle humour in it, and plenty of things never going quite according to plan. It made me feel proud to be Scottish, and proud that Hamilton and his friends stood up and did something.
As for the making-of, it is called The Taking and Making of the Stone of Destiny. It features little bits of "chat" from all the actors and the director, a Canadian named Charles Martin Smith. Rather fascinatingly, it also features the real Ian Hamilton, who was involved with the film. I was slightly disappointed with the making-of feature, as I felt they could have told a little more of the history and also maybe spoken to Hamilton about the eventual legitimate return of the Stone to Edinburgh in 1996. I thought that was an opportunity lost. I did however enjoy Robert Carlyle's segments, he is a favourite of mine and what he says about Scottish nationalism is spot on. The information about the making of the film is interesting, but with a name indicating not just information about the making of the film but the actual taking of the Stone, I expected more.
This really is a great film, and one that I think you should all make an effort to see! It's educational, fun and moving all in one, and tells an important part of Scottish, and British, history - the taking of the Stone was one of the early steps on the long road to devolution.
This review was originally published by me under the same username on Dooyoo.co.uk.
Advantages: A really lovely little film Disadvantages: None
== THE STONE OF DESTINY ==
=== 2008 ===
=== FILM ONLY REVIEW ===
To Scottish Nationalists, in fact to Scottish people everywhere, the Stone of Scone (or Stone of Destiny) is of vast importance. This insignificantl looking block of rock was taken by Edward I in 1296 from the Abbey of Scone near Perth, carted down to Westminster Abbey and fitted into a wooden chair that every subsequent British sovereign (except Queen Mary) sat on during their coronations. ... ...so much so that the stone was eventually returned, amid much pomp and ceremony, to Edinburgh Castle in 1996. The Stone has always been shrouded in mystery and controversy. Traditionally, it is supposed to be the pillow stone said to have been used by the Biblical Jacob, another legend holds that the stone was actually the traveling altar used by St Columba and yet another is that Robert the Bruce gave a portion of the stone to Cormac McCarthy, king ...
oldchem 14.10.2009
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful Review of Stone Of Destiny DVD
Advantages: Gentle comedy Disadvantages: A bit twee in parts
The Stone Of Destiny is the film account of the story of the rescue of the Stone Of Destiny. The stone, also known as the Stone of Scone, is symbolic as it was used to crown Scottish monarchs. It was stolen from Scone by Edward the first in 1296 and has been used in the coronation of British monarchs ever since. Many saw its location as a symbol of Scottish oppression and appealed for the stone to be brought home again but powers that be insisted ... ...to London to claim the stone back. Obviously this presented a few problems, firstly the stone was fixed to the Coronation Chair within Westminster Abbey and obviously it is a huge heavy stone so is not easy to transport or hide. He couldn't carry out this feat alone so seeks help from fellow students Gavin (Stephen McCole), Kay (Kate Mara) and Alan (Ciaron Kelly).
Their plan was amateurish to say the least with tactics decided in pubs and written ...
wigglylittleworm 28.10.2008
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful Review of Stone Of Destiny DVD
Advantages: interesting story, good acting Disadvantages: none
...read a few reviews about Stone of Destiny and was quite intrigued by the storyline particularly as it is based on a true story. I also knew that it had one of my favourite actors - Robert Carlyle - in it so decided that it would definitely be worth watching. The film is set in 1950 at a time when a lot of Scottish people resented being part of Britain (not much has changed there then!) Four young university students decide that in order to express ... ...belongs! That symbol is the Stone of Scone which at the time was secured underneath the coronation throne in Westminster Abbey. Not exactly an easy task then! The film starts with one of the students, Ian Hamilton (Charlie Cox) coming up with the plan. He tries to rope his friend Bill (Billy BOyd) into the plan but although he supports his friend's madcap scheme he feels that he has too much to lose if it all goes wrong! Therefore, Ian has to find ...
kingfisher111 20.07.2009
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful Review of Stone Of Destiny DVD