About me:Why does the damned site keep logging me out when I'm trying to upload reviews?!?
Member since:11.07.2000
Reviews:776
Members who trust:82
Review rated by 12 Ciao members on average: very helpful
Professor Lawrence Wetherhold is a university lecturer who considers himself an intellectual giant but has no idea about relationships. His family is falling apart at the seams and he can't find a publisher for his new book. His daughter Vanessa is a teenage over-achiever who loves nothing more than pouring scorn on others, his son James is barely speaking to him and his adopted brother Chuck is a grade-A freeloader. After an accident Lawrence is banned from driving for six months, so Chuck moves in to be his driver. The professor also stumbles across one of his old students in the form of Doctor Janet Hartigan and he slowly begins to wake up to the possibilities of life.
Debut director Noam Murro walks in the footsteps of dozens of other independent film directors. The world he presents is a dull, depressing one, as signified by the washed-out palette and faceless town he uses as his backdrop. So it hardly seems surprising that the people who inhabit it are so emotionally stunted and disconnected. Murro's case isn't helped by the muted performance style he encourages in his cast which conspires to make the whole production feel too understated. The pacing meanders as we skip back and forth between characters, which underlines their lack of connection with each other but also distances them from us an audience. The fact that they're doing nothing of any importance at these junctures fails to endear them to us. The director clearly doesn't feel anything for any of his players and his antipathy towards them is infectious. They feel like constructs
within the story rather than human beings. The film appears to be made from uncomfortable silences and awkward conversations. And as nobody shares their feelings on anything, it is impossible to understand what they're going through or empathise with their situations. This makes the pacing very slow and renders the whole movie a long hard slog from beginning to end. Murro's comic timing is slightly off so the handful of gags that appear are ineffectual because they are dragged out too long. The end result is a very mediocre character study that is nowhere near as smart as it thinks it is.
The screenplay by Mark Poirier perpetuates the myth that all clever people are emotionally retarded, socially dysfunctional monsters with superiority complexes. It seems an odd prejudice to hold as without the titular smart people we would have died out as a species long ago. Nonetheless this has become a handy stereotype in recent years as the phenomenon of "dumbing down" has taken hold. As Lawrence and his daughter Vanessa are so emotionally constipated it makes it virtually impossible to care about them. But the same can also be said of his adopted brother Chuck who is nothing more than the slacker stereotype turned middle-aged. Janet is a handy example of how intellect and people skills can mesh. But the problem is that the characters aren't fleshed out beyond the clichés so they have no distinct personalities or idiosyncrasies that allow you to identify with them. And the suggestion that the intelligentsia should stop taking themselves seriously and loosen up (preferably with the help of drugs or booze) feels overly simplistic. There isn't enough story to sustain it through its ninety-five minute running time, making the pacing plodding. A literally last minute attempt at humanising the main protagonist and suggesting a redemptive character arc is too little too late. By that time you have long since ceased to care and you'll be waiting for the movie to dribble to a halt. The dialogue is almost devoid of the snappy banter suggested by the trailer and considering how intelligent most of the characters are meant to be, you'd think they could come up with more inventive put-downs than their playground retorts.
Dennis Quaid seems an odd choice to play Lawrence Wetherhold as he's more of an action man than a cerebral actor. He looks too young for the role and as if compensating, adopts a paunch and a bow-legged walk, both of which look fake. It's a superficial performance in many respects. Quaid does gruff, self-important and pretentious well enough, but there isn't enough going on behind his eyes to convince that his character believes his boring pomposity is justified. His relationship with his on-screen love interest is marred by an absence of sexual chemistry.
Ellen Page is positively viperish as Vanessa. She comes across as smart, sharp and pedantic. But she's extremely unlikeable as she is also joyless, jealous, petty and old before her time. Although it may show the young actress has range, she feels a little too harsh on occasion so she doesn't feel quite human. There's no sign of underlying fragility to temper the sourness so Page's performance feels two-dimensional.
Thomas Haden Church essentially reprises his role from "Sideways" as Chuck. He's so laidback he's horizontal as the heavy drinking, stoned slacker whose personality seems to be predicated on a bad haircut and ratty moustache. The turn may fit the character but it feels like there's no depth. Sarah Jessica Parker on the other hand is completely miscast as Janet. Her performance is entirely superficial and though she may hit the marks and say the lines there's no sense of an inner life. There needs to be more shades of grey in the part and Parker simply isn't a subtle enough actress to breathe life into the role.
If I had known the film's composer was Nuno Bettencourt, former lead guitarist with Extreme I could have predicted exactly the sort of score he would come up with. Of course the music is heavy on guitars - they feature in virtually every arrangement. Whether it's the opening echoing strummed acoustic guitars or strutting warm strings and guitars or guitar and sleigh bells for Christmas his favourite instrument pops up everywhere. There are exceptions such as synthesizers with "dah-dahing" vocals and rising strings. Sadly this lack of invention means you filter out the music and what sneaks through is very bland. The same is true of the other soundtrack choices which lean towards middle-of-the-road maudlin indie.
"Smart People" is a generic first movie debut that lacks any real style or wit. I'm not sure how it managed to attract so many big names as the writing is bland and the direction uninspired. It doesn't have anything new to say about relationships or the price of intellectual snobbery. The performances are mediocre and there's little to recommend the production to anyone. I wouldn't spend money on seeing it and odds are, if you happen across it on television, it will fail to grab you and you'll surf straight on to the next channel. Perhaps it would work better on the small screen where its budgetary constraints might not be so obvious. But it can't help feeling like a self-indulgent TV movie. Still I suppose it means first-timers Murro and Poirier can only get better.
eriously brilliant monumentally self-possessed intellectual giant. However when it comes to solving problems relating to love and family he's completely lost! His teenaged daug...
26.05.2008 21:29
Very good review.... Descriptive and very interesting....Thanks. J.
26.05.2008 21:21
Thank you for the warning. Will keep away from this one. Great review.