Production Year: 1992 - Horror - Director: Francis Ford Coppola - Original Language: English - Classification: 18 years and over - Starring: Gary Oldman, Winona Ryder, Anthony Hopkins, Keanu Reeves, Cary Elwes, Richard E. Grant, Tom Waits, Sadie Frost, Bill Campbell more
Advantages: strong symbolism mirroring Freudian psychoanalysis | screenplay | acting | camera | cutting Disadvantages: Bill and Ted's not so excellent side-stepping adventure in falling down a castle wall land
...the Victorian era in which Bram Stoker wrote his famous novel, condensing centuries of various myths into a cultural icon which spawned legions of books, movies, musicals, yes - and trite t.v. series...
Starting out from a somewhat cheesy opening scene that establishes the character of the bloodsucking count, this film soon gains both momentum and depht, slips the audience a couple of hints and foreboding scenes to enhance tension, sidesteps elegantly ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average very helpful
Advantages: Hunky Gary Oldman in purple glasses Ozzy Osbourne shocker!! Disadvantages: some cringy cliches, NOT a faithful adaptation to the book, although some bits are, bit of a chick flick -dare i say
...on a minute!.... love? In Bram Stoker's Dracula?!...surely this must be in reference to the Jonathan Harker/ Wilhemina Murray partnership that begins the tale? Dracula isn't capable of love?! He just wants to suck everyone's blood doesn't he? Apparently not.........
...........................................................................................
=
ALL STAR CAST *******
=
Gary ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average very helpful
Advantages: Oldman Disadvantages: We've seen a lot of it before
...extraordinary film maker and with Bram Stoker's Dracula he has created a memorable film, thoroughly blood curdling and gruesome, absorbing and seductive, capitalising on all the erotic delights and associations of the vampire legend. It's vivid and sensual, doomy and dark, just like we always wanted our Dracula to be, but at the same time you almost feel sorry for this despicable fiend, more hapless victim than criminal reaper of souls.
Coppola ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average very helpful
Advantages: Good visuals and effects, brooding eroticism Disadvantages: Some corny acting
Oh! How brave i must have felt, when in 1992 I went to see a horror film at the cinema for the first time. It was at the multiplex at Port Solent on the outskirts of Portsmouth. I shot along the M27 in my Austin Maestro (god, i was a real man about town, wasn't I?) and went to see Francis Ford Coppola's film 'Bram Stoker's Dracula'. as you might imagine from the title, the film purports to be a true and authentic representation of such a seminal work ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average very helpful
Did you enjoy it?
Story
Characters / Performances
Special Effects
How does it compare to ...
very helpful
06.07.2004
Love and Let Die Review ofBram Stoker's Dracula (DVD)by
dadmancat
Advantages: Faithful and Carefully Crafted Disadvantages: Lacking cohesion and any real chills
Francis Ford Coppola's take on the Dracula tale never quite hits full speed, despite all the best intentions. Reasonably faithful to the original text, and with a careful eye on design and casting, it is hamstrung by a new element to the story, which will be familiar to fans of the Mummy genre, reincarnated love interests.
Dispensing with retreads of the stage version of Dracula, which spiral way back to the 20's, James V Hart's screenplay looks ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average very helpful
Advantages: Faithful adaptation Disadvantages: The ending
...claiming to be based on Bram Stoker’s book. Unlike previous versions of Dracula, largely based on the Hamilton Dean stage play, this is almost entirely Stoker, apart from one thing, which is the film’s only downfall.
I’m sure most people know the story of Dracula, so I won’t bore you by repeating it, but instead will go one to describe why the film is such a joy to watch. As so often, it’s the little touches that do ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average very helpful
Advantages: Style, chilling, faithful to original novel. Disadvantages: The bat costume.
What first strikes you about this movie is it incredible level of style. The whole film takes on an eerie, seductive feeling that can only be likened to that of Dracula himself.
You know that this is sticking closely to the original premise set out in the novel even if like myself you've never read it. The most notable chilling moments are those when the count's shadow appears to be following Dracula. The effect is done with such subtlety that ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average very helpful
This is the best vampire/Dracula film that I have watched.
Gary Oldman plays an excellent Dracula and Winona Ryder is, as always, brilliant.
I did also notice that the costumes were really good in this film, but that maybe a typical woman's point of view!
Although it is quite a long film I can't think of any bits that are boring. The storyline is steady all the way through. Even Keanu Reeves, who usually really annoys me, is good.
This ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average very helpful
Advantages: Brilliant performance by Gary Oldman Disadvantages: Terrible performance by Keanu Reeves
Bram Stoker would have been amazed if he knew that the stories his mother told him while he was sick in bed, would grow into one of the biggest myths and moneyspinners of the 20th century.
Coppola's film is a gothic, sumptuous and rather overblown version of the novel. As for 'faithful' - I don't remember a bit where Lucy runs through the garden wearing a red curtain only to be shagged senseless by a bison. Or the bit at the beginning where Vlad ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average very helpful
Advantages: The best vampire film ever made. Disadvantages: Gets lost a bit in second half. Keannus dreadful acting.
I agree with Incoginito(check his review) when he say this is the best vampire film ever made. That is to say I think the first half is the best ever. I've been watching horror movies since I was around 7 (and I'm 32 now!) and this is the closest I have found to capturing the romantic/gothic/horror element that makes vampirism the most fascinating of the horror genres. Even Nosferatu doesn't quite capture the sprirt of Dracula like this gothic opera(even ...
Read review
Advantages: Dark atmosphere and style, well- cast, hsitoric subtones Disadvantages: None really
This is THE greatest vampire film of all time, after Nosferatu and Blade, for one good reason. All vampire fils fall into three types: slayfests, like Blade and the original Buffy the Vampire Slayer film, vampire sexfests (being em I ain't seen any of them) and very rare explorations of the vampire legend. BS Dracula is one of the latter films. BS Dracula gives a whole new light, or darkness. This film gives vampirism a new rich and deep style, a ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
Advantages: Fantastic story, wonderful gothic images, a familiar myth come to life. Disadvantages: It isn't good for those who do not like the sight of blood.
Dracula, most feared of all vampires, recreated for your viewing pleasure. He renounces his god on the death of his wife Elizabetha, and becomes the undead, searching eternity for his lost love.
Dracula, (Gary Oldman) a seductive killer, finding his Elizabetha reincarnated as Mina, (Winona Rider), determined she will love him again.
Dracula, the eccentric count who employs Mina's intended husband Jonathan (Keanu Reeves),to buy him property ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
Advantages: Francis Ford Coppola Disadvantages: none
This 1992 version of the Bram Stoker novel is different from the previous Dracula movies that were made in 1931, 1958 and 1979. The visual style is stunning and I just love they way they handled the characters.
Without a doubt the best thing about this movie is Gary Oldman in his role as the blood sucking count from Transylvannia. His Dracula is like a mix of the scary looking Nosferatu from "Nosferatu, eine Symphonie des Grauens" and the gentleman ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
Did you enjoy it?
Story
Characters / Performances
Special Effects
How does it compare to ...
helpful
01.02.2007
Super version Review ofBram Stoker's Dracula (DVD)by
XMiKe
Advantages: Disadvantages:
I saw this movie three times. I still want to see it. It's magnificant. You'll be caught in action. Dracula was put on movie in many many variants. I think this is the best. It's more interesting for me beacause I'm from Romania (even from Transilvania). This is a good fiction about Vlad Tepes, a transilvanian leader who LIVED. He put bad people in spikes. Was a terror. Noone dared to do something bad. The movie is about lord Dracula who leaves in ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
Did you enjoy it?
Story
Characters / Performances
Special Effects
How does it compare to ...
helpful
11.07.2000
Quick review of Bram Stoker's Dracula DVD Review ofBram Stoker's Dracula (DVD)by
scarletpurity
Mistitled but gorgeous movie. Gary Oldman is excellent Dracula (now true-life 15th century prince Vlad Tepesh, who, quite frankly, was the filthy sadist and does not deserve the honour) who finds the reincarnation of his true love in 1897 London. He falls for gorgeously dressed and strikingly beautiful Mina Murray (ideally cast Winona Ryder) and vampirizes her equally stunning friend Lucy (ideally cast Sadie Frost), an English rose with a nymphomaniac heart. (Very Stokerian Lucy, eh?) Sets, costumes, colours and score are glorious and evocative backdrop to this story of rich ruby red "blood", passion and undying love, with the Victorian fascination to East shown in costumes and harem fantasies.
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful