Deleting account in 5 days. If you want to stay in touch, send me a guestbook message.
Deleting account in 5 days. If you want to stay in touch, send me a guestbook message.
Member since:08.03.2001
Reviews:254
Members who trust:141
How do you define making an impact on the world? How about being so infamous, having such an impact on the state of mind of a nation, that you have a word names after you? And all for putting on paper what many, many people think about, but never dare admit. Sadism. Named after the Marquis de Sade. Written about with… quills. Do you see?
Set in 1794 Paris, this is a fictionalised account (by Doug Wright, adapted from his own play) of the rise (oo-er) and fall of de Sade, played by Geoffrey Rush (Shine, Mystery Men). The movie opens on what appears to be a torrid love scene, which soon turns out to be something else entirely, all watched from the prison cell of the Marquis.
Years later, and de Sade is now resident in the Charenton mental asylum, but continues his depraved writings from his luxuriously furbished cell. His latest work, Justine, is being smuggled out, chapter by chapter with the assistance of laundry worker Madeleine (Kate Winslet from out of Titanic). She is taking the manuscripts to a courier, who in turn gets the work to a publisher, and de Sade’s Justine sells through the streets of Paris like erotic cakes.
Unfortunately, the work is not only read out on street corners to dirty minded Parisians, but by one of Emperor Napoleon’s lackeys. To Napoleon himself. The passage in question involves a bishop and the improper use of a communion wafer. Napoleon demands execution for the Marquis, but his aide has better ideas. He wants to send in Royer-Collard (Michael Caine from out of Get Carter – both of them), a strict asylum administrator, to make Charenton into a picture of decency, and maybe just subject de Sade to one of his torturous treatments.
The
current administrator is Abbot Coulmier (Joaquin Phoenix from U-Turn & Gladiator), who is easier than a Sunday morning on Easy Street after someone has proclaimed it National Day of Easy Going. He is a friend of de Sade (or so it would seem), enjoying wine with him, and easier to push over than a cardboard standee of Kate Moss. This is why the Marquis has a cell resembling, well, something very un-cell like – he has a real bed, books, art, and is allowed to keep writing as Coulmier believes it will purge his mind of evil.
With Royer-Collard in place at the asylum (purely in an advisory capacity, he stresses), it seems that de Sade may be tamed. However, a glimpse into Royer-Collard’s life reveals him to be as questionable in character as the Marquis himself. He claims a teenage bridge, Simone (Amelia Warner) from a local convent, which becomes a whispered tale on the streets of the French capital. This soon works its way back to the Marquis, who decides it is worthy of farce. So he writes one.
De Sade tricks the lax Abbot to let him use the inmates to perform his sordid tale, with Royer-Collard as the guest of honour. His teenage bride is amused by the graphic descriptions of sexual acts – he is not. This is the penultimate straw for the new administrator, who is clear about his displeasure to Coulmier. Even so, the Abbot is as good at putting his foot down as a snake, and de Sade continues his tirade of smut by any means possible.
Movies based on plays can go one of two ways – episodic in nature, it can be hard to find a narrative flow that works. Fortunately, this does not suffer that problem as much as, say, Glengarry Glen Ross. Philip Kaufman's (Rising Sun, The Unbearable Lightness of Being) direction is stylish and clever, although this does smack of “made for TV” on occasion, seeming more like something the BBC would screen. Only with the F word and some unpleasant violence – some of it sexual.
Come (oo-er) to think of it, for something based around the original spankster, there is very little sexual activity. The first half hour is packed with more innuendo than a barrel full of Kenneth Williamses (is that a word?), but later descends into more torrid territory, with some of the inmates unable to control their desires. This is where the movie really kicks into gear – this could have easily been a debauched no brainer, but instead sets some solid arguments in place. Are the weak-minded easily swayed by such powerful writings? Can art spark off the deep recesses of one’s imagination against one’s will? Maybe not so much today, but in the days of de Sade, it would seem that no one was beyond corruption. We all have our perversions – it is whether we carry them out or not that makes us monsters.
Rush is great as de Sade, and seemingly relishing such an eccentric role, seeing as his first major film role was that of another troubled genius. He exposes himself, runs riot, says the F word with great passion, and easily steals the show. Winslet is also on top form, playing an understated role with all her powers on maximum. She is innocent but tempted, and an unwitting temptress to the shy Coulmier. And Joaquin Phoenix is great as ever as the Abbot – this man needs a movie all his own. He is proud but determined, and brings a strange warmth to the repressed holy man, who really believes he can do good through the bible, when de Sade’s work is having far more of a psychological effect on Paris – and on him.
Caine is unstoppable as the twisted and quite pathetic Royer-Collard. Determined to bring order to the chaos of the asylum, he is also a proud man – too proud to admit his failings, and to admit that he is not the best man for the job. Greedy and arrogant, the former Alfie actor has had a shot in the arm of late, and is a great villain.
Support comes from a variety of faces that I seem to have seen in crappy UK sitcoms, as well as former Crystal Maze presenter Ed Tudor Pole – playing a lunatic… I’m guessing he didn’t even need to read for the part, as his demeanour is more or less identical to his “come on follow me” attitude in the old game show.
I found this to be an odd experience. There are no heroes, save for perhaps the Marquis. As he says himself, he only documents the world around him, he has no say in how things transpire. Just as the people moved by his works, after watching this, I was not sated. I’ve read de Sade once before, but this made me want to see what all the fuss was about. As his work becomes more restricted through the movie, so do our glances of it, until at the end people are literally begging for more. This is an excellent conceit, and I’m sure it’s what the writer wanted. To understand the Marquis, you need to read his work, and after seeing this, I fully intend to.
Still, the movie does not quite sit well with me for this same reason. Not finding a principal character to settle on, it drifts through the lives of Royer-Collard, Madeleine, Coulmier and de Sade, obviously trying to delve into everyone’s persona, but never quite deciding who is the more interesting. I would have preferred more sadism and less soul-searching, but as it stands, this is like opening a pack of pickled onion Monster Munch and finding one that’s a different flavour to the others – a curiosity, but one you don’t mind sampling.
Oh, by the way, this features the most insipid quotes from newspapers ever on the front sleeve. One reads “Sadistic” – well, duh, IT’S ABOUT THE BLOODY MARQUIS DE SADE! And worse – “Sexual”. Am I going mad? AM I INSANE? Forgive my rant, but it’s like writing “DO NOT EAT” on a piece of dog dirt – pretty damn obvious.
Recommended for fans of: Carry On films and swearing.
Not for fans of: Songs of Praise, morals or old men's arses.
www.illusions.com/sodoku/chronology.htm - a full and thorough chronology of the Marquis' life up to age 57.
www.ksm.fr/pausecaf/La_Coste/Sade/introSadeVE.html - take a clickable tour of de Sade's castle - tricky to read the intro page, but some nice shots of some ruins... if you like that sort of thing!
www.neilschaeffer.com/sade - another fairly extensive biography site, including the pretty odd feature of being able to receive prison letters from de Sade every week in your e-mail!
How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines
Production Year: 2004 - Drama - Director: John Duigan - Original Language: English - Classification: 15 years and over - Starring: Charlize Theron, Stuart Townsend, Penelope Cruz
Production Year: 2004 - Drama - Director: Nick Cassavetes - Original Language: English - Classification: 15 years and over, 12 years and over - Starring: Rachel McAdams, Ryan Gosling, Gena Rowlands
Your review proved to be very witty and informative. I liked your mention of the clever conceit, and the light hearted way in which you approached the subject of the famous Marquis.
p.
With bedroom eyes and the mischievous smirk of an insatiable roué, Geoffrey Rush is a ... more
perfect choice to play the Marquis de Sade inQuills, adapted by Doug Wright from his own stage play and directed by Philip Kaufman. Imprisoned in France's Charenton a...
Postage & Packaging: £1.21 Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days...
With bedroom eyes and the mischievous smirk of an insatiable roué, Geoffrey Rush is a ... more
perfect choice to play the Marquis de Sade inQuills, adapted by Doug Wright from his own stage play and directed by Philip Kaufman. Imprisoned in France's Charenton a...
Postage & Packaging: Free! Availability: Usually dispatched within 24 hours...
Academy Award Winner Geoffrey Rush ('Shine') stars as the infamous Matrquis de Sade who ... more
has shocked generation after generation with highly charged erotic writings. Rush's powerful central performance is supported by an exceptional ensemble cast, inclu...
Academy Award Winner Geoffrey Rush (Shine) stars as the infamous Marquis de Sade who has ... more
shocked generation after generation with his highly charged erotic writings. Rush's powerful performance is supported by an exceptional ensemble cast including th...
Postage & Packaging: £0.00 Availability: 3-5 working days