Pixar have, so far, never put a step wrong with each feature film and each short animation they create. They created the landmark Toy Story and even persuaded Disney to put Toy Story 2 to the big screen instead of straight to video as most of their sequels end up. Monsters Inc. is their new feature length film and, once again, is a mixture of laughs, drama and stunning animation.
It’s fair to say Disney have been struggling more than a little bit with their recent wave of films. Atlantis flopped in a fairly big way last Summer and the only other things they have managed to do is sequel upon sequel and this is true with Return to Neverland – the sequel to Peter Pan which has straight-to-video standards but brought to the big screen, ironically it looks set to do better than Atlantis but the quality just isn’t there. Pixar have helped more than a bit, along with their other sister companies such as Dimension. Toy Story and Monsters Inc. and the like may have the Disney name on the posters and credits but its Pixar that has been the superb creative talent behind the films.
Monsters. Inc follows the story of two best buddies Mike (Billy Crystal) and Sulley (John Goodman). They live in a parallel world called Mostropolis where the inhabitants are, quite unsurprisingly given the name, monsters. They live out their lives in exactly the same way as humans do, they go to work, they eat and sleep and they probably have sex as well but this is a Universal rated film so unless with have Monsters XXX we won’t delve too much into that aspect. The city is powered by the Monsters. Inc factory run by Waternose
(James Coburn), which has been providing the city with enough electricity to run efficiently…well at least it used to. The source of the factories energy comes from the children’s screams when a monster comes through their closet door (so Americanised) screams are bottled up and used to power up the city. However thanks to media influences kids are getting a lot harder to scare and energy levels are getting ever lower and so it is up to the monsters to keep trying to get scarier or live in constant black out.
The monsters in the factory ‘Scare Because They Care’ they don’t want to be mean but need to in order to survive. Sulley has been the top scarer for months now but is in a competition with all round bad-guy Randall (Steve Buscemi) the invisible, shape-shifting monster set out to get back Sulley whichever way he can and this involves sneaking a few scares in off hours. It is when this happens when the big no-no of the Monsters. Inc world happens as a little girl, Boo (Mary Gibbs), enters the monsters domain. Children are considered highly toxic to monsters and a single touch could be fatal and any item of human origin has the Child Detection Agency storm in. With this in mind Sulley is less than pleased when he finds Boo in his world but, being a caring monster, aims to put her back in her world as soon as he can.
That is the gist of the main story in Monsters. Inc. While the film does have its focus centred on Mike, Sulley and their escapades with Boo the energy plot is still given screen time, especially towards the end, there is also a little romantic-comedy subplot of Mike and Celia (Jennifer Tilly).
Sidestepping from the story for now no review of this film would be complete without mentioning the incredible CG animation that is witnessed. Much has been made of the fur coat that Sulley is kitted out with. Pixar made the first tentative steps of producing fur in Toy Story 2 with Andy’s dog but that was nothing compared to Sulley. Each strand had to be animated individual to create a realistic effect, it moves when Sulley breathes on it, when he walks and talks and when there is a wind blowing. So basically nearly every time he’s on screen. However its not just Sulley that excels in animation. Backgrounds are far more detailed than in previous Pixar films with all sorts of movements and other characters on screen at any one time. Lighting effects are also superbly done as well as the fluid movement of the characters in the film. As with all Pixar films the animation is not realistic. Lasseter said there was simply no point in trying to achieve a realistic world in animation. Therefore colours are brighter and more vivid than in the real world also Boo, with her big wide eyes and large head, does not mirror a human child.
There is one main difference to Monsters, Inc than other Pixar films, John Lasseter has neither directed or wrote this film but has stayed behind and produced the film. His absence can be felt and, unfortunately, without him Monsters, Inc stumbles where Toy Story 1 & 2 excelled. It is common knowledge that Pixar, as well as animating cracking films can also write superbly as well. There are many in jokes in Toy Story 1 and especially 2 to keep the adults interested and the actual dialogue in the film is also a bar above other kids movies. However Monsters, Inc fails to be quite as sophisticated when it comes to the script as animation. This cannot solely be because of Lassester’s absence there is only so much one person can do. The main reason is because of the characters. Monsters, Inc biggest disadvantage is having a two-year-old girl as a main character. Because of this there is hardly going to be some mind-blowing conversations to be had and while dialogue between Mike and Sully is often witty and funny there is little of it as soon as Boo arrives. While the Toy Story films brought the script along with the story Monsters, Inc falls into slapstick humour instead of speech and a great deal of the film is spent carting Boo along the factory and trying not to be seen. While this is still fun to watch (and the animation is enough to keep you interested anyway) you cant help but think that this isn’t as funny as it really ought to be especially since the heavy referential Shrek has come along. Mind you I doubt Pixar could really take a stab at Disney quite yet.
That gripe aside Monsters, Inc is pretty much solid. The pace is just fast enough to keep you interested (though there is a slight lull in the middle with the Boo-hiding) and the story, while not revolutionary, develops well. The voice talent is, as ever, excellent and hardly surprising given the cast that are doing the voice over.
Another staple to Pixar films is the climatic ending. Toy Story had the lorry chase, Toy Story 2 the aeroplane and Monsters, Inc has the doors. It really is an awesome sight to behold as Mike and Sully go through door to door and end up in different worlds while trying to rescue Boo. Defianatly one of the best animations in sheer size to be seen the only bad thing about it is that it wont look as nearly as good on a little screen. The ending itself is OK. I must admit that I felt it was a bit too slushy and too kid friendly but, hey, I’m not a kid so what do I know.
The film also comes with the traditional Pixar animated short. This time ‘For The Birds’ (which won this years Oscar for Best Animated Short) which is an amusing little scetch. Also, as ever, there are the outtakes at the end of the film and this time they last right up to the end and are, of course, very, very funny to boot.
So, while Monsters, Inc, is defiantly not a Toy Story 2 beater it’s still a better film than most out at the moment. While it won’t offer adults as much enjoyment as the other films there is still reason enough to go and it still won’t be the kids that will get something from it.
MONSTERS, INC IS
Fun to watch Superbly animated Better than what Disney could do
MONSTERS, INC IS NOT
Full of good dialogue Quite as good as TS Going to keep you awake at night
How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines
Congrats on the diamond - great review and well deserved. Monsters Inc was ok, but not as clever as Toy Story or Shrek. I agree with you about the character Boo being SO annoying!
The monsters inMonsters, Inc.are just so incredibly cute--and they know it. Whereas Woody, ... more
Buzz and pals in theToy Storysaga were filled with self-doubt about just how much the children in their lives would continue to love them, here our heroic monste...
Postage & Packaging: £1.21 Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days...
The monsters inMonsters, Inc.are just so incredibly cute--and they know it. Whereas Woody, ... more
Buzz and pals in theToy Storysaga were filled with self-doubt about just how much the children in their lives would continue to love them, here our heroic monste...
Postage & Packaging: free Super Saver Delivery Availability: Usually dispatched within 24 hours...
Monsters Inc. is the largest scare factory in the monster world and the top Kid-Scarer is ... more
James P. Sullivan (John Goodman) a huge intimidating monster with blue fur large purple spots and horns known as "Sulley" to his friends. His Scare Assistant...
Postage & Packaging: £0.00 Availability: 3-5 working days
Advantages: Everybody likes monsters inc, whether your an oap or a toddler it is suitable for the whole family. This film has alot of funny moments and has hidden jokes in for the older audience. Disadvantages: This film can drag on a little and it is east to predict what is going to happen next.
k8tybaby 21.10.2005 ·
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: somewhat helpful
Review of Monsters, Inc. (DVD)