Sorry have been away I am still getting over having my baby so early. I had preeclampsia again and h...
Sorry have been away I am still getting over having my baby so early. I had preeclampsia again and had to have a C Section. Baby on Scbu and I will get on with writing soon.
Member since:11.01.2003
Reviews:282
Members who trust:121
Belonging to a film club I get to see a lot of films. In fact, watching films is one of my favourite pastimes. Recently I watched “The Last King of Scotland”. It is a 2006 British drama film based on Giles Foden's novel.
It tells the fictional tale of Dr Nicholas Garrigan (James McAvoy). He is a young Scottish doctor who visits Uganda and meets with dictator Idi Amin (Forest Whitaker). On meeting Idi Amin he soon becomes his personal physician and this is where the story begins. The film is based around actual events of Amin's dictatorship.
The film begins in Scotland 1970 when Nicholas Garrigan graduates from medical school. The young man has no idea of the events that are about to take place in his life. He has no idea how his work will change history or where he will end up. Maybe if he did know then he wouldn't choose the path that he did decide to take. I suppose the thought of helping his father in the family's village doctor's practice didn't seem quite as exciting as working for Idi Amin as his personal physician. Nor did working in the family doctor's surgery pay quite as much in money or in favours. In fact, working for his father wouldn't really put him in the same seemingly glamorous position as the position in Uganda. After all for a young single man who hadn't travelled much in his life Uganda seemed much more glamorous and exciting than Scotland did. Amin made sure that everything was in place for Garrigan, set with a position in a foreign Country with everything paid for and all accommodation arranged as well as a passport it was no wonder he was tempted to swap his ordinary life for that, that seemed to offer so much more, but would inevitably lead to his downfall.
Nicholas Garrigan was naive he didn't know the kind of monstrous dictator he was working for and who was to blame him for thinking that he was a wonderful hero? After graduating from medical school Garrigan wanted a bit of adventure in his life.
He was already working in a missionary clinic run by Dr David Merrit (Adam Kotz) and his wife Sarah (Gillian Anderson) when he was offered the position to work for General Idi Amin.
It could have been fate when Garrigan met Amin, but whatever it was that drew the pair together it would inevitably end in hardship. General Idi Amin as the film shows had many good things about him, but also many that were bad. One thing that Amin and Garrigan had in common was that they both admired everything that was Scottish. Amin was perhaps drawn to Garrigan because he was Scottish and their friendship grew from there. At times I wondered about General Idi Amin and just how sane he was. Being in such a powerful position must have played its toll, but there was a certain charm about him despite the horrendous atrocities he committed. There is no excuse for the torture he put his people through but, many times we see that people in power are like puppets. They are often driven by some other force and Amin was plagued by his dreams. Amin who loved everything about Scotland gave himself the name of King of Scotland. I guess that this could offend many Scottish people who are far away from the way Amin used his authority. Strange how Amin adored the Scottish yet hated the English. Amin did actually serve in the Scottish military for some time and four of his sons were given Scottish names.
Although the film claims it was based on true events it is debatable and a lot of the story is due to creative license. Giles Foden who wrote the original novel is also one of the screenwriters as well as Peter Morgan ("The Queen") and Jeremy Brock ("Mrs. Brown"). In the novel Garrigan does not feature it is only in the film that we meet Garrigan that is why I say there is a lot of creative license. I think it is interesting how we see through the eyes of Garrigan and it makes the story come to life. Whether General Idi Amin was really quite how the film portrayed is also debatable. After all it is hard to believe that someone who was the ultimate reason for so many atrocities and horrendous deaths could have had so much charm about him. I actually felt sorry for him at times during the film, but when I look at what was done to black people I cannot stand to think of any man who could do this.
At first life is wonderful for Nicholas Garrigan who plays Idi Amin's personal physician, but soon he realises that he is trapped in a nightmare where there is no escape. Performances are fantastic and award winning. General Idi Amin Dada of Uganda is a monstrous dictator. The material is a little unusual and at times the plot seems a little complex. However Fox Searchlight do present a wonderful film that is moving at all times. Although Amin can be charming he can turn at any given moment. He is drastically unfair to Garrigan who impressed him when he responded well to a roadside emergency. Little did Garrigan know the life he was buying into or the man whom he worked as personal physician. Garrigan is a strong man who stands up to Amin where others would not dare. Garrigan always speaks his mind and this is what Amin finds so impressive. Amin knows that he can always rely on Garrigan's opinion.
When Garrigan chooses Uganda to practise his new medical degree he is placed in a remote village where he meets an older married woman named Sarah Merrit (Gillian Anderson). Garrigan immediately has his sights set on her even though she is married to a hard working British physician (Adam Kotz). When Nicholas and Sarah attend a back country lively rally they meet Amin who has just booted the country's corrupt, communist-leaning leader, Milton Obote.
General Idi Amin did not lack any confidence at all he was a proud man full of ego although he did lack sanity. He was responsible for around 300,000 Ugandan deaths during the 1970's. Garrigan is representative of all of the young, naive people who fell in love with Amin and helped him come to power. Little did these people realise that what they were creating was a monster. Each character within this film has a realism about them and touches you in some way. The acting is believable and natural. Considering the complexities of these characters the actors play them well. Garrigan is a real person who you can relate to and who you feel sorry for.
It must have been a challenge for the writers of the film to make Amin seem believable. All the mythical stories that still surround him to this day must have made this task more difficult. After all how do you weave the unproven stories of cannibalism and ritualistic killings into a film that will be credible. Despite the fact that Amin was stereotyped as a monster throughout he did have elements to his character that were charming. Some people viewed Amin as an unintelligent man yet he could speak in ten different languages and although his actions seemed insane he knew what he was doing most of the time.
This film is an adaptation of a book and also inspired by historical events even though it is not completely based on truth it is a good representation. The film caught my imagination and was inspiring. The film carried along at a pace I could follow it wasn't too slow or too fast. I would recommend this film to anyone especially if you like historical films or true stories. It is a difficult film to watch and will probably make you cry so make sure you have tissues at hand.
To answer some of the questions in the boxes of this review page. The story is strong and memorable, characters are believable and well acted, special effects consisted of explosions where Idi Amin was nearly blown up, compared with other films this film is one worth watching and is a strong competitor. I cannot really remember the soundtrack so it mustn't have been very memorable. Compared with other films from the same director this film is of the same high quality. Because the film was such a fantastic watch if you are purchasing this it is good value for money.
How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines
Drama - Original Language: English - Classification: 12 years and over - Starring: Shelagh Fraser, Barbara Flynn, Keith Drinkel, Felicity Kendal, Pam Ferris, Colin Douglas
Production Year: 2004 - Drama - Director: Nick Cassavetes - Original Language: English - Classification: 15 years and over, 12 years and over - Starring: Rachel McAdams, Ryan Gosling, Gena Rowlands
As the evil Ugandan dictator Idi Amin, Forest Whitaker gives an unforgettable performance ... more
inThe Last King of Scotland. Powerfully illustrating the terrible truth that absolute power corrupts absolutely, this fictionalised chronicle of Amin's rise and f...
Postage & Packaging: £1.21 Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days...
As Ugandan dictator Idi Amin, Forest Whitaker gives one of the great performances of ... more
modern movie history (The Wall Street Journal), one that the Associated Press calls nothing short of OSCAR worthy. This is Amin's incredible story as seen through the ...
As the evil Ugandan dictator Idi Amin, Forest Whitaker gives an unforgettable performance ... more
inThe Last King of Scotland. Powerfully illustrating the terrible truth that absolute power corrupts absolutely, this fictionalised chronicle of Amin's rise and f...
Postage & Packaging: Free! Availability: Usually dispatched within 24 hours...
A Scottish doctor on a Ugandan medical mission becomes irreversibly entangled with one of ... more
the world's most barbaric figures: Idi Amin. Impressed by Dr. Garrigan's brazen attitude in a moment of crisis the newly self-appointed Ugandan President Amin ha...
Postage & Packaging: £0.00 Availability: 3-5 working days
Advantages: An amazing central performance from Whitaker, strong direction, characterisation and writing. Disadvantages: Some characters are clear plot devices.
Advantages: An amazing central performance from Whitaker, strong direction, characterisation and writing. Disadvantages: Some characters are clear plot devices.