If you've left me a rating on either my Imaginarium of Dr Parnassus or In the Valley of Elah reviews...
If you've left me a rating on either my Imaginarium of Dr Parnassus or In the Valley of Elah reviews, please let me know as they are showing up as 'not yet rated' even though at least fifteen of you have rated each one.
Member since:11.07.2000
Reviews:778
Members who trust:82
After a series of lawsuits are filed against superheroes they are all forced to go into a witness protection programme and live ordinary lives. Mr Incredible and his wife Elastigirl are just two of these unfortunates, posing as the unassuming Parrs; forced to live in suburbia, doing frustratingly meaningless jobs and raising their super-powered kids as best they can. But Mr Incredible can’t let go of the past and is itching to get back into his super-suit and save the world…
The set-up for “The Incredibles” is a good one. The characters are introduced through a series of old-fashioned talking heads, during their glory days. Mr Incredible is top of the tree, the so-cool-he’s-freezing Frozone is the cool dude on the block and Elastigirl is a forthright super-heroine who can stretch, bend and twist better than any yoga instructor. So you know how difficult life is for them when they are forced to suppress their powers and live in suburban normality. The Incredibles’ kids are super too, Violet has invisibility skills and son Dash is super speedy and forever getting in trouble for using his powers at school. Both he and his father feel like they are being punished for being too good. “Everyone is special,” Elastigirl tells Dash, only for him to reply “Which is another way of saying no-one is.”
Director Brad Bird may not be a household name but he should be. He directed the wonderful “Iron Giant” and worked as executive consultant on “The Simpsons”. Now I enjoyed “Finding Nemo”, but it suggested that Pixar were finally giving in to the Disney sacred childhood ethic. It was good but a touch saccharine at times. Thank God then for Brad Bird who has brought a darker sensibility to the
CG company’s output. The gags have more bite to them (witness Edna’s beautifully illustrated diatribe against capes; “Look what happened to Stratogirl – sucked into a jet engine!”) and the characters take on the air of the disgruntled everyman (like Bob taking his frustration out on his car in souped-up Basil Fawlty style). Going against the Disney grain, people die in horrible (but often hilarious) ways. The titular family is far from perfect and there is plenty of bickering and backbiting to go around, reminding us of everyone’s favourite animated TV family. The characters are in the main, recognisable sit-com staples that the audience can identify with, with a handful of weird and wonderful wildcards thrown in.
This being a Pixar animation, every shot is a technological marvel. Okay, the humans aren’t photo realistic, but if they were, what would be the point in making a cartoon? They take on the air of the square-jawed cartoon heroes of the Cold War period (like Dudley Do-Right), all made of upside down triangles (broad at the shoulder, slim at the hip) with oversized heads to top them off. The attention to detail is exquisite, with dozens of photo realistic aspects in every frame. The textures are incredible; hair, grass, fire smoke, wood, plastic and plasterboard are all lovingly recreated. Water and ice have the right weight and texture. The characters move realistically, having the correct squishy musculature and this gives them weight and presence.
The production design has a late 1950s’ to early 1960s’ retro-futuristic flavour to it, with the Parrs’ home looking like an exhibit in an ideal home show of the period. It all ties into a parody of the golden age of James Bond movies. Everything from the costumes to the score add to the super-spy-referencing gambit. There are glamorous girls, gadgets, gizmo-filled cars, inventors and double lives; I mean the super-villain has a lair inside a volcano! And there are plenty of nods at villains’ tendencies to launch into monologues at inappropriate moments. The distinction between the real and superhero worlds are reflected in the characters’ surroundings, with flat colours and hard edges illustrating the mundanity of Bob’s office, while his nemesis’ lair is made of curves and brilliant shades and colours. Similarly a great deal of attention to detail has gone into the design of the heroes’ costumes, with an alarming array of colours and textures being used to capture the superhero vibe in lycra and PVC. Frozone dresses and moves like a speed skater, while Elastigirl’s body and outfit take on all manner of shapes as she stretches all over the place.
The voice talent is uniformly excellent, with Pixar largely using unknowns in the main roles, to avoid any preconceptions about the characters. The big names that appear (Holly Hunter and Samuel L Jackson) are used sparingly, to add that extra touch of class without forking out for an enormous pay packet. Some of Pixar’s favourite character actors have made a come-back with Wallace Shawn providing the voice for Bob’s jobs-worth boss and John Ratzenberger literally popping up at the end. My favourite character was Edna Mode, costume designer to the superheroes, who is a sure-fire cult heroine. She is a tiny, no-nonsense fashion doyenne complete with non-specific European accent, voiced by the director. The scenes where she is parading new super-suits are amongst the funniest in the film.
The jokes come thick and fast, incorporating sight gags (like Mr Incredible squeezed into a tiny car, or throwing his back out as he takes on a monstrous foe), character and situation comedy (Elastigirl finding out her husband has been secretly helping people after fining rubble on his collar) and cartoon violence by the bucketload. There are also plenty of one-liners to savour like “They’re penetrating bureaucracy!” There are some real surprises, in the tradition of all the best superhero and spy movies, though some plot twists are obvious. The biggest and funniest shock, though is when baby Jack-Jack’s powers come to the fore. I laughed so hard I nearly choked on my popcorn.
The score by Michael Giacchino is a thrilling affair that bears more than a passing resemblance to the work of a certain Mr John Barry, who was responsible for the Bond theme tune. In fact it’s so close to his style that I’m sure his lawyers will be taking an interest in it. It’s particularly effective in the big action scenes. It works brilliantly hand-in-hand with the closing two-dimensional 1960s’ style end credits too.
This being a Pixar movie, there is of course a short preceding the main feature. It is a wonderfully odd creation called “Boundin’” that combines folksy vocals and the tale of a fluffy little lamb whose pride comes before a very big fall. It’s worth seeing just for the oddity value. It plays like a 3D take on the earliest animated shorts where all the characters danced about continually, just because they could. I was particularly fond of the hopping mad owl and the “Whack-a-Mole” gophers. And the Jackalope is clearly the product of a deranged mind.
If you only take your kids to one movie this year, this should be it. It is a multi-faceted gem that can be enjoyed by children and adults alike. Kids will love the high-octane action sequences and sight gags, while grown-ups can marvel at the craftsmanship involved in the production as well as all the clever parodies and film conventions that are observed. If this doesn’t get the Best Animated Feature Oscar next year, there’s no justice in the world. In fact the only thing wrong with it is that there are no post-credits shenanigans.
How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines