Am using ciao more for consumer purposes only now. I still sign in and read ops and may occasionally...
Am using ciao more for consumer purposes only now. I still sign in and read ops and may occasionally write one for the database, but no longer consider myself part of the community. Timmy/Mike.
Member since:28.04.2001
Reviews:55
Members who trust:124
There was only one film that mattered in 2001. No, not Lord of the Rings, but Harry Potter and The Philosopher’s Stone. The reviews have been varied, but while some have slated it as a poor adaptation the overwhelming verdict on ciao is that this was a classic in our time. I’m inclined to agree.
And I intend to review the film on it’s own merit, not concerning myself with the quality of the adaptation or anything like that, mainly because I haven’t read the book (yet). I write as a sceptic made a fan, dragged to the cinema to be won over by the magic of Harry Potter and his early adventures at Hogwarts. From the moment this incredible world leapt onto the cinema screen till the credits started to roll over two and a half hours later I was totally spellbound, enchanted my the sensational creations of J.K. Rowling (author of the book on which the film is based) and Chris Columbus (the director).
So, what created this marvellous, enchanting potion?
~The Recipe~
Harry Potter is dumped on the doorstep of his aunt and uncle as a baby after the unfortunate death of his parents. He grow up being bullied and mistreated by his guardians and his spoiled cousin, Dudley, but is essentially just like any normal 10 year-old boy, or is he? It would appear not, for one day (Dudley’s birthday) he has the fortune of being able to visit a zoo, the only real excursion he’s ever been on. While there he has to put up with his horrible cousin but is amazed when a snake appears to respond to his words and talks to him. At this juncture Dudley knocks Harry to the floor and in a releasing of his rage Harry somehow manages to free the snake and trap Dudley behind the glass; an inexpliquable occurrence blamed on Harry that lands him many weeks of being locked in his bedroom (if you can call it that, for it is only a small cupboard under the stairs). Young Mr. Potter has no friends (because Dudley hates him and nobody wants to defy Dudley’s gang) and never gets to go anywhere (except once to the zoo) so is incredibly surprised when he receives a letter, amazingly addressed to Mr H. Potter, The Cupboard Under The Stairs, 4 Privet Drive, Little Whinging. Regrettably Harry does not open the letter until he goes back into the kitchen, when his horrible cousin wrestles it from him and
gives it to his uncle. Harry’s guardians are horrified and send him and Dudley out of the room, before burning the letter. But lo and behold, you’ve guessed it, another letter arrives the following day and Harry’s uncle starts acting very strangely indeed; in fact he is so fearful of the letters that he takes the rather drastic action of boarding up the letterbox . In response more letters arrive the next day, through various cracks and open windows and the next day hundreds arrive and pelt Harry’s uncle, but still Harry is prevented from reading one.
Shortly before Harry’s 11th birthday the situation becomes so bad that his uncle takes his family to an old shack of the coast, with virtually no food or warmth and a storm raging outside. Still, no letters arrive, but instead, at midnight on Harry’s birthday a huge giant arrives to collect Harry and present to him a letter in person. Harry can hardly believe what it says; he has a place at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry (and the mad giant gives Dudley a pig’s tail). He discovers that he is famous in the wizard world for being the only person to escape the clutches of the evil Lord Voldemort, who disappeared after killing Harry’s parents but failing to kill Harry. And so, bewildered he collects the equipment he needs (wand, owl, robes etc.) he heads off to King’s Cross with his ticket to Hogwarts departing from platform 93/4. What?! Harry is terrified and a station guard just looks at him, but fortunately he overhears a women cursing “bloody muggles” and after inquiring discovers that all he has to do is run into the barrier between platforms 9 and 10… why didn’t he think of that?
On the train to Hogwarts he meets the rather dense but likeable Ron Weasley and the incredibly precocious swot Hermione Granger, who are to become his best friends at Hogwarts and are in the same house as him Gryffindor (there are three other houses). He also meets the sneering, unpleasant Draco Malfoy who from the start becomes Harry’s arch-enemy, matters being compounded by his being in the nasty Slytherin house. Over the course of the year Harry is to struggle through transfiguration lessons with Professor McGonagall, defence against the dark arts with the stammering Professor Quirrel, history of magic with Professor Binns, herbiology with Professor Sprout, charms with Professor Flitwick and of course Potions with the nasty, spiteful, unfair Professor Snape (who is entirely coincidentally head of Slytherin house)! Then there is the mystery of the forbidden third floor right-hand corridor and little does Harry know what immense adventure lies down there, while all the while he is learning the way of the wizard world and growing up, playing quidditch (the wizard sport) and using his father’s invisibility cloak to discover the remarkable Mirror Of Erised.
It may sounds bizarre, ridiculous and perhaps even a slightly clichéd idea, but the depth of imagination shown in the finer points of the plot and the relatability of Harry’s trials and tribulations in the wizard world to those we had when we were 11 is very strong even if exaggerated; such issues as friendship, peer-pressure and bullying are dealt with. Little touches make the world seem real (“Wow, a Nimbus 2000 broomstick, the fastest yet”) and kept me bewitched by the storyline. Furthermore the plot is actually rather amusing, with such ideas as detentions in the deep dark wood, Hagrid (the gamekeeper’s) accidental revelations and the slightly humorous stereotyping of Ron, Hermione and Malfoy, who all seem “just like someone I know” but even worse! I can now understand why the Harry Potter books had such success and I doubt that much of the plot is lost on the film, for if it is then the books must be absolutely out of this world! I strongly suspect that this film would’ve been worth seeing if the acting and effects were terrible, but as you may have gathered from my five star rating, you have plenty of by drooling drivel left to come!
~The Wizards and Witches~
The auditions for the parts in this play received a great deal of publicity, particularly as the main characters are so young and so the actors have to be in their low teens and are consequentially virtually unknown. The plumb role of the hero Harry Potter was won by Daniel Radcliffe who puts in an excellent, if not flawless performance. He has a believable look of a humble boy awed by his surroundings and a slightly put-on bravery towards Malfoy (which is just right, or at least seems it). However he does have a slight problem loosing these stereotyped roles when perhaps he should no; he is unable to look totally happy at winning a quidditch match, for example. Rupert Grint plays the support role of Ron and manages to convincingly play a bit of a resistant ‘mummy’s boy’ who is easy to wind up but essentially harmless. However Grint does fail to play the brave role he has to at the end to the high standard he performs throughout the play. Emma Watson is fantastic as Hermione, hitting the right note as a precocious snob; her voice and mannerisms are slightly exaggerated to add a mildly amusing touch yet she breaks out of this mould when she is supposed to, in the troll scene among others. Tom Felton is wonderfully arrogant and sneering as Malfoy and a typical nasty, rich, public-school type, a stereotype that probably amuses the majority of the British public, even if public schools are far more modern and less arrogant these days (to my knowledge, which admittedly isn’t great).
Others such as Maggie Smith (Professor McGonagall), Richard Harris (headmaster Albus Dumbledore) and Alan Rickman (the evil Professor Snape) put in excellent, convincing yet amusingly stereotypical performances and special praise must go to Robbie Coltrane as the gamekeeper Hagrid who puts in a delightful performance as a delightful character. The small parts are equally strong but impossible to analyse and overall the acting does justice to the plot; the young actors in particular excel themselves in their very prestigious and potentially overawing roles.
~The Finishing Touches~
The lighting, sound, camera, digital and special effects are every bit as exceptional as the rest of the constituent parts of the film. Hogwarts school is displayed in all its beautiful brilliance, while the much weakened Lord Voldemort is quite convincing. Spells, charms, potions and magical plants are well portrayed and levitation and flying, particularly quidditch, are superbly depicted and the sight of someone flying a broomstick chasing after a little golden ball with wings, way above thousands of screaming fans is surely a particularly difficult effect to create. Goblins, trolls and the like are wonderfully presented, if not as seriously as in Lord of the Rings and the whole set is generally very convincing depiction.
~The Result~
This is one bewitching potion that even Severus Snape can’t call useless, and if you’ve see the film (or’ve read the book) you’ll see that that’s saying something! The plot is sensational, the acting of a very high standard and the effects equally fantastic. The story is enjoyable for all the family; a gripping thriller for the kids (probably age about 7+) and an equally gripping but light-hearted bit of fun for adults (probably age about 14+). It definitely works on two levels, testimony to J.K. Rowling’s imagination and writing skills and Colombus’ skill as a director. A definite recommendation to just about all; I’ve yet to here of anyone who dislikes it, although those who have a phobia of snakes (e.g. my Mum) may wish to close there eyes for the first ten minutes… this should not detract too much from the enjoyability of the whole. Happy viewing!
PS: I wrote this opinion a while ago but saved it for the video release (today- 11th May 2002) as I correctly guessed this would be in the middle of my exams, for the duration of which opinion writing is on hold. I have since read the books, all the first four in fact, and can see why many of those who read the book first thought the film was disappointing; having seen the film again (with people who hadn’t seen it, not because it was so great or anything) after reading the book I can see it fails to give an impression of time passing or school dragging on in the way that just a few words can. Anyway, enough of this rambling- the video is certainly worth watching.
How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines
Only saw the film last year on video,, but well worth seeing. It is a film I could watch again at some point. The way you put this film accross was really helpful and clearly written. A great all round family film,, good fun for everyone.. Lynn-Marie
tastebud 15.07.2003 10:52
I was disappointed with the film and thought a lot of the acting was really bad. Noticed some big improvements in The Chamber of Secrets, though. -- Nicole
jayne78 17.09.2002 13:58
My sister loves H.P and has read all the books and stuff, she was lucky enough to get tickets to one of the preveiw showings, she begged me to go with her, i told her no-way it wasnt my kind of film anyway i ended up going and i really and admitted that i really enjoyed it, i have since bought it on dvd.
To try and please all the fans of JK Rowling's novel was a challenge that the makers ... more
ofHarry Potter and the Philosopher's Stonemet head on. The result of their efforts is one of the most lavish, beautiful and magical cinematic treats to hit our screens...
Postage & Packaging: £1.21 Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days...
As the first Harry Potter film of the celebrated series, this is a must for ardent fansand ... more
newcomers to the global fantasy phenomenon. An adaptation of J. K. Rowling's enchanting, funny debut novel,Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone(known as the ...
Postage & Packaging: £1.21 Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days...
To try and please all the fans of JK Rowling's novel was a challenge that the makers ... more
ofHarry Potter and the Philosopher's Stonemet head on. The result of their efforts is one of the most lavish, beautiful and magical cinematic treats to hit our screens...
Postage & Packaging: £1.21 Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days...
Advantages: Not a lot really, No American Actors Disadvantages: Poor editing, no soundtrack to speak of, poor special effects, generally poor adaptation
Advantages: Offers freedom to watch all films so you can keep a continual track of the story. Disadvantages: Although enjoyable, the later films are more compelling to view than those before.