Blah, blah, blah - I'm bored and etc. Anybody got a car they want washing?
Blah, blah, blah - I'm bored and etc. Anybody got a car they want washing?
Member since:03.10.2000
Reviews:231
Members who trust:70
Many names pass from mere reality into common use even though their source may be long gone. The same is true (possibly more so) in film: The Bride of Frankenstein, King Kong, Darth Vader etc. All characters that have had such a striking effect on their audiences that they've managed to make the leap into icon (even if the original films have long since disappeared, especially in the case of the first two in the list). The same is true of Dirty Harry. Most people know the name and for many years I knew the name but hadn't the faintest idea about the film itself. Yes I knew that it was Clint Eastwood and that he was a tough cop but what else? Erm, don't know sir.
With a crazed killer holding the city of San Francisco to ransom, the police department appear to be helpless. The killer, Scorpio, is demanding $100,000 else he'll start killing yet more people and although the authorities agree to pay when he kidnaps a young girl, one cop won't lie down to this scum and is determined to catch the killer at all costs. Detective 'Dirty' Harry Callahan lands the job of delivering the money to Scorpio and although he's regarded as something of a maverick, he does get results and has been around long enough to know how the game is played. With Scorpio giving Callahan a beating, he lets the girl die anyway and that lets Callahan loose. Playing a deadly game of the hunter and the hunted, Harry's going to get his man, and a little thing like correct procedure certainly isn't going to get in his way.
Spawning a hundred catch phrases, Dirty Harry is one of the turning points in cinema. I don't mean in terms of being revolutionary, or challenging the staid conventions of Hollywood, but rather that it ushered in the gritty violent cop pictures of the 70's. So all you liberal do-gooders out there should point your finger in this direction - here's your culprit.
Dirty Harry is unlike any cop film before it with the possible exception of Coogan's Bluff. That Eastwood appeared
in both is important and the earlier film is definitely a pre-cursor to the film that was to follow. While Coogan's Bluff was the embryo, Dirty Harry is the full blown article. The 70's cop drama was born here and in many ways the film set the mark for others to match - not always successfully.
Before this we had 'friendly' cops, comedy cops, film noir cops, and even 'unconventional' cops, but Harry takes all of them, lines them up and puts a bullet straight through their heads. The film is intense, hard, in-yer-face, and unquestionable violent. It never attempts to soften things, hide things, or tone things down, and indeed it's perfectly in the style of it's lead character: Callahan is a tough guy who throws caution to the wind and won't let the law get in the way of him nailing the bad guy. This is part of his charm though. He can do what we can't, he tell the D.A. to blow it out his ass while he goes after his foe. This is what makes Harry work as he plays out our fantasies for us. We all want to tell our bosses to swivel on it and shove their rule book, and Harry does this.
This is indicative of the film as a whole. Cops are no longer the saintly figures of old and Dirty Harry's unconventional approach to the subject is like a punch to the kidneys. It brings you straight up to attention. It slaps you hard and forces your face up against the screen. Is this good or bad? Oh undoubtedly good. A film that can grab you by the lapels and shake you up is a rarity (in fact there will be those reading this who weren't even born when the last film that achieved it was made).
So far though I've rambled (as always) about impact, style, and not paid any attention to the film as a product. The story is good. It's different in it's view of cops and the underbelly of America. Yes Coogan had done the low life angle before it but Harry goes the whole hog and gives us the seedy America that we all know so well these days. Pimps, druggies, dealers, hookers - they're all here and they all feel right in Harry's world. They enhance the decency of the man who has grown weary of the depravity around him and is doing everything he can to make things better. We appreciate his resentment and non-conformance all that much more. Why should he play by the rules when the bad guys don't?
Story, story, story. It's good. The crazed killer is given plenty of screen time and although we don't know WHY he does what he does, we certainly understand what a cold blooded calculating fellow he is. This showing of both sides of the coin is very much in Harry's favour. We get a more rounded and complete picture and this gives the film great depth. Yes many will see it as a hard man cop with a big weapon (oo-er) shooting people but it's so much more than that.
Clint Eastwood is THE man and his Harry Callahan is one of the roles that transformed him from cowboy into superstar. Eastwood looks fabulous and although his hair is a law unto itself, he snarls, grunts, and powers his way through a film that defined him. Eastwood gets the tough guy routine down pat and his insubordinate comments are just a joy to behold. The odd joke here and there is wonderful relief and Eastwood handles himself mightily. The fact that his lines of dialogue are so quotable is down not to the script itself but the way in which he spits them out.
Andrew Robinson as Scorpio makes a very good adversary for Eastwood and although he wouldn't really go on to do much (should I be sad and say that he was Garrack in DS9? No, I don't think so) he has an evil streak that would serve him well. His crazy eyed performance is almost in stark contrast to Eastwood's limited emotional style and this heightens the contrast between the two characters. Beyond Eastwood and Robinson though, the rest of the cast fade into the background somewhat.
Harry Guardino does a decent job as Harry's over stressed boss, and while Reni Santoni puts in a solid performance as Chico Gonzalez, it's John Vernon who stands out. Vernon's mayor is excellent and provides one of the best scenes in the film (which I'm just itching to quote but won't) (yet).
Don Siegal's vision of the maverick cop and the seedy world in which he works is excellent cinema. Ok so it might not be artistic, revolutionary, or even pretty but it has impact none the less. Siegal keeps things moving at a breakneck pace and he throws in enough action and violence to satiate even the most bloodthirsty of appetites.
Dirty Harry is a violent film though and there's no getting away from the fact. It may be tame compared to some of the blood fests that followed it but there are guns everywhere (little blood though surprisingly). Liberals may scream at it but I for one wouldn't. It IS violent and maybe it would desensitise kids but the fact that it carries an 18 cert means that it SHOULD be out of the reach of the impressionable. Yes someone will always try to cite films/games/whatever as the cause of violence in society but the fact is, is that the impressionable should never be subjected to these 'extremes'. I watched it (several times in fact) and I can honestly say that I had no great desire to blow someone's brains out (well, no more than normal).
There are scenes of violence throughout but they're far more than that. Look beyond the bullets and blood and you'll find some entertaining dialogue, some excellently shot scenery, and one hell of a view of 70's San Francisco.
So the liberals will hate it, but what of the sane? Sadly the no brain element of society will find it wonderful, but for all the wrong reasons. It has the guns, the swearing, the violence, and the initial image of being a film that panders to male fantasy (without Kim Cattrall wearing not very much but such is life) but it has so much more that will fly straight past them. This is where Dirty Harry will have greater appeal. Ok so it's NOT a masterpiece of the cinema (and anyone who proclaims it as such is an idiot) but it's a great piece of entertainment, and that's something that's lacking in so many films (especially these days).
That it spawned a whole new genre almost single handedly is an achievement that you shouldn't forget (it's not a reason for it to be highly regarded though - there are plenty of 'good' reasons anyway). While The French Connection, The Seven Ups and all the rest of them might do things differently, add in new elements, and expand on things, Harry got there first and paved the way.
Followed by 4 sequels (of progressively worse quality and you should cut your losses after The Enforcer by the way), the original film in the series is great entertainment and worth catching if you're in the mood for some gritty cop violence (with a big gun). And who can fail to be impressed with a scene involving a man in the nude carrying a 6 inch knife whilst collecting for the Red Cross?
How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines
Production Year: 1964 - Action/Adventure - Director: Cyril Endfield - Original Language: English - Classification: Parental Guidance - Starring:Stanley Baker, Jack Hawkins, Ulla Jacobsson, James Booth, Michael Caine, Nigel Green
Production Year: 1989 - Action/Adventure - Director: Rowdy Herrington - Original Language: English - Classification: 18 years and over - Starring:Patrick Swayze, Ben Gazzara, Sam Elliott, Kelly Lynch
Production Year: 2002 - Action/Adventure - Director: Vincenzo Natali - Original Language: English - Classification: 15 years and over - Starring:Lucy Liu, David Hewlett, Anne Marie Scheffler, Joseph Scoren, Matthew Sharp, Jeremy Northam
Production Year: 1977 - Action/Adventure - Director: Clint Eastwood - Original Language: English - Classification: 18 years and over - Starring:Clint Eastwood, Sondra Locke, Pat Hingle, William Prince, Bill McKinney
What about the bit where he was trying to talk down the guy who was going to commit suicide by jumping off the building? "All that blood and puke..." Great op on a great film. Andrew Robinson looks better with a Cardassian mask on his head but then again, a lot of clothes and hair styles from the 70's were awful. Memorable line: "Get out of my way, hammerhead!"
ILoveJackDaniels 03.05.2002 11:31
"You don't assign him to murder cases, you just turn him loose". I really enjoy this movie every time I see it - especially the way the villain always seems to be at the very edge of insanity, right to the end....
superpricee 01.05.2002 15:48
Great op on a great film Neil - and you're right about those catchphrases. Another wee snippet about Andrew Robinson is that he played Liberace in a TV biopic, but decided not to have the...erm....metal pole inserted.
"Dirty" Harry Callahan was one of the first screen characters to embody contemporary fears ... more
about crime--and the uncompromising response to it that much of the audience would liked to have seen. Clint Eastwood's laconic rogue cop became an instant scree...
Postage & Packaging: £1.21 Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days...
Advantages: good role for Eastwood & direction from Don Seigal, thought provoking, good action Disadvantages: violence slightly stylised, poor picture/sound quality, feels dated