I was born, I grew up (perhaps) and I'm not dead yet.
I was born, I grew up (perhaps) and I'm not dead yet.
Member since:04.12.2002
Reviews:7
Members who trust:2
The first half of the movie is fantastic; one of the best Bonds ever. The credit sequence, taking the unusual step of continuing the action of the film, nicely captures the fevered, hallucinogenic state of Bond's mind as he's tortured. The godawful Madonna theme song is an unwelcome distraction, though: although it *starts* really well, with nicely dramatic staccato cellos, it then just wibbles off into techno absurdity, with bloody Madonna saying things like "Sigmund Freud" for no good reason...
Aaanyway. Back to the film. The idea of Bond being out of action, deprived of his 00 status, is similar to the plot of the earlier Timothy Dalton film License to Kill. Unfortunately, like License to Kill, the film never really explores this potentially interesting idea; it's another example of a strong set-up that's never followed up on in the second half of the film.
There are plenty of visual and musical cues for the dedicated Bond fan to pick up on; the
most obvious being the old storeroom full of Q-Branch gadgets. It's a touching moment, made doubly affecting by the absence of Desmond Llewelyn as Q. The film's locations in the first half of the movie are interesting; Cuba, Hong Kong, North Korea and an old London Underground station where Bond is debriefed by M.
Then Bond goes to Iceland, and the movie goes tits-up. The carefully-established setup, and slightly melancholy mood set up in the London scenes is thrown away in favour of an all-action spectacular. For starters, the plot just meanders to Iceland; the villain says "I'm demonstrating my <Dr. Evil> giant laser <Dr. Evil> in Iceland, fancy coming along?" When the villain has to *invite* 007 to his death-machine, something's gone seriously awry with the plotting.
The much-maligned CGI surfing sequence is fun when you watch it (ignoring the ropy CGI), but it clearly shows the direction this film's going in, and sad to say, it's Moonraker. Goldeneye's tank chase was at least reasonably plausible; this just stretches credibilty that little bit too far. As does the invisible Aston Martin. And the fact that the *baddys* car has gadgets just like Bond's; that sort of takes the fun out of it. Everything about the film suggests that they were upping the ante, more gadget-laden cars, *more* super-villainous threats, and so on. Like Moonraker. I wouldn't be surprised if the next film was a "return to basics" like For Your Eyes Only or License To Kill...
There are little niggles; for instance, the film never makes much of the fact that Bond was captured and tortured. The writers claim they included this sequence to make Bond seem less invulnerable, and then they show him engaging in his bizzare surfing antics later on... Oh, and as for Gustav Graves - his Big Secret is an interesting concept for a villain, but again, the fact that he models himself after a parody of Bond could've been expanded upon; it would've been a nice opportunity in this 40th anniversary movie to examine Bond, and to force the character to examine himself. Again, it was just a throwaway, especially since the character seemed more like Richard Branson crossed with Hugh Grant than James Bond. Oh, and his plan was crap. If you've got a giant lazer in outer space, why bother blowing up some landmines in North Korea? Why not just threaten to blow up Washington DC?
But my real problem with this film was Halle Berry's Jinx. Given that it's Bond's anniversary film, the focus should've been on him throughout; instead, every other scene we cut away to the antics of this halfwitted American "action-woman" cliche. It seems that the producers were so overjoyed at casting her, they forgot that the focus is meant to be on *Bond*. She chewed up the screentime Fundamentally, I didn't give a toss what happened to this character; she had all the sexual appeal of a wet dishrag, and as a character, she just wasn't as interesting as Bond. As an example, just picture what the final battle on the aeroplane would've been like *without* her; Bond would've had to face off against *two* professional fencers (and one trained martial artist). Instead we cut between two fight sequences, and both suffered for it.
So, in conclusion, the first half of the film showed real promise, but halfway through it derailed and we ended up getting the second half of a (mediocre) Roger Moore 007 film. Oh, and Madonna's song sucked worse than crumbly dog eggs.
How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines
Production Year: 2002 - Action/Adventure - Director: Vincenzo Natali - Original Language: English - Classification: 15 years and over - Starring:Lucy Liu, David Hewlett, Anne Marie Scheffler, Joseph Scoren, Matthew Sharp, Jeremy Northam
Production Year: 2003 - Action/Adventure - Director: Jonathon Mostow - Original Language: English - Classification: 12 years and over - Starring:Arnold Schwarzenegger, Nick Stahl, Claire Danes, Kristinna Loken, David Andrews
Production Year: 1964 - Action/Adventure - Director: Cyril Endfield - Original Language: English - Classification: Parental Guidance - Starring:Stanley Baker, Jack Hawkins, Ulla Jacobsson, James Booth, Michael Caine, Nigel Green
Advantages: Great action, stunts, nice humour, good baddies (if you get my meaning) and Halle Berry! Disadvantages: Double entendres are more 'worthy' of a Carry-on film