If you've left me a rating on either my Imaginarium of Dr Parnassus or In the Valley of Elah reviews...
If you've left me a rating on either my Imaginarium of Dr Parnassus or In the Valley of Elah reviews, please let me know as they are showing up as 'not yet rated' even though at least fifteen of you have rated each one.
Member since:11.07.2000
Reviews:778
Members who trust:82
Catherine Tramell is back! This time the sex-crazed killer is implicated in her footballer husband's death. A staid British psychiatrist is brought in to unravel her secrets, but he soon begins to fall under her spell.
British director Michael Caton-Jones must be hard up for work if this is what he's making. It feels like career suicide just watching it. He's clearly from the school of obvious film-making, if this cut-and-paste job is anything to go by. There's nothing in the least bit original about any facet of it. London is shot mainly at night, swathed in neon blues, in an attempt to make it sexy. Everyone in the movie appears to be rich and playful if the number of big houses, apartments and cocktail parties are anything to go by. Catherine's risk addiction is embodied solely by her chain-smoking and sexual activity is always signposted by the hackneyed open fire or jacuzzi motifs. You can tell the director is hoping to use the film as a calling card for Hollywood because he takes everything so seriously. This is part of the problem - everyone in the movie treats it too earnestly, pretending it's high art when it's really an excuse for an ageing actress to get her bits out on screen. If it had been approached as a silly bit of fun, it would surely be more amusing to watch. As it is, I found myself howling with laughter at the dodgy dire-logue and stupid smut. The production values are atrocious; it's as if the film was knocked out as quickly as possible on a miniscule budget. At least one of the corpses is visibly breathing. For no apparent reason, Dr Glass has his office in the middle of the Lloyds building. Catherine's signature has switched from ice picks to tacky plastic lighters of London landmarks. The icing on the cake comes during a scene at a mental hospital where pantomime lunatics spend their
time running around, whooping and hollering for no good reason. It's hardly an accurate portrayal of mental illness. The pacing is all over the place and as a result, the film feels longer than 114 minutes. It also has a tendency to feel disjointed, but that isn't helped by the nonsensical script.
Apparently Sharon Stone waited years for the right script for a "Basic Instinct" follow-up. Obviously, she or her bank manager got tired of waiting and went for this pile of toss. If this was the best available, I'd hate to see the reject pile. I am amazed it took two people to write. Leora Barish and Henry Bean should be ashamed of themselves. In an attempt to shock the public, the dialogue is suffused with expletives and sex is routinely referred to as f***ing. The writers seem to think that a sexually predatory older woman using these terms is sexy; talking about sex in this way so often is merely tawdry. And it is done so often and at the most inappropriate times that it simply becomes funny. When Catherine delivers the immortal line "What would you say if I told you I think about you when I masturbate?" you'd be inclined to reply "I think that's highly improbable." The characters are so two-dimensional they don't even have personalities. Catherine is a clear-cut nymphomaniac murderess and Dr Glass is a dull as ditch-water non-entity. However, the worst offender is a stereotypical Teutonic shrink, who is so OTT it feels like he's been shipped in from "Young Frankenstein".
The main problem with the script is that it thinks it is cleverer than it is. It's trying to be a twisty erotic thriller, but feels more like a spoof. If it was pegged as a comedy, it would be considered genius. As it is, it feels more like an embarrassment to filmmaking. The thriller aspect is so dumbed-down the makers may as well have forgotten it entirely and just made a porn film (that being said, you get very little sex for your ticket price, smut-fans). Basically, everyone connected with the psychiatrist ends up dead and you have to guess who did it. The attempt to add a subplot featuring a dirt-digging journalist is laughable. It is knee-capped by the journo falling foul of the murderer before it becomes clear what he's involved in. It is a plot device used to add another suspect to the otherwise non-existent list. The plotting is pointlessly convoluted and highly improbable. There is no good reason why Dr Glass would fall for Tramell, knowing her to be a dangerous psychopath. He brings everything upon himself and as a result, you won't give a damn about him. No-one from the scientific community would touch her with a barge-pole, but two other shrinks fall under her spell. It's clear even to the layman that she's a grade-A nutter. There are so many obvious clues (distinctive lighter at a murder scene, anyone?) and attempts at mind games are so patent that you'll give up caring before the second corpse has been found. And by the time the final twist is revealed, you'll be guffawing at how mind-numbingly stupid it is.
Sharon Stone used to be considered something of a sex bomb; strong and intelligent but not afraid of her sexuality. However, her second outing as Catherine Tramell may well put paid to that. She's gone from being sharp to hard, confident to smug, beautiful to over made-up and a decent actress to a terrible one. All of her emotions are entirely unconvincing. She substitutes jaw-clenching, staring and squinting for real feelings. She has zero chemistry with her male co-stars and totally overplays her hand. So instead of being sexy, she puts in the kind of nudge-nudge, wink-wink performance that would have embarrassed Sid James. Getting your baps out for the lads doesn't mean you're sexually alluring.
David Morrissey looks like he'd be more comfortable in an episode of "Doctors" than on the big screen. He has no presence whatsoever and is far from attractive, being pasty and pudgy, making it impossible to figure out what praying mantis Tramell would see in him. I've owned shoes with greater ranges of expression. Seeing him in the buff is like accidentally walking in on your dad - it's not pleasant and it makes you feel dirty and a little bit sorry for him. David Thewlis spends most of the film looking perplexed. He's probably trying to figure out why his agent got him a job that required him to grow a bad ginger 'tache and cash in his credibility. Still, I suppose he's got baby clothes to pay for. Ex-footballer Stan Collymore is so wooden, you expect him to float when his car goes into the Thames.
It's a shame the costume budget didn't extend to buying underwear for Miss Stone. Her nipples get more exposure than a naked Eskimo. But I suppose all the money went on a series of ludicrous outfits that do nothing to make Sharon Stone look classy. It's all trashy lycra slit up the thigh and down the back. The skin-tight nature merely makes it look as though she bought everything two sizes too small. All of the outfits seem to be about collar and cuffs. She spends most of the film looking like she's going to a vicars and tarts party. There's even the horror of the word that hates women; cat-suit. Did she learn nothing from "Catwoman"? Then there's her propensity for wearing fur; proof that though it may take twenty dumb bitches to make a fur wrap, it only takes one to wear it.
It is apparent from the oily, sweaty faces of the men where the make-up budget has gone. From the amount of slap on Ms Stone's face, I expected her make-up artist to be credited as "Polyfilla". It makes her Dior endorsement feel more like "Dior God, no!"
The score by John Murphy suffers similar delusions of grandeur to the rest of the movie. It is more epic in scope than anything else in the film, seeming to think it belongs to a hard-edged political thriller that requires brooding strings and big orchestral brass to get its message across. It's sub-Bond in its use of echoing chimes and sinister strings and flutes. It might actually be good if it wasn't attached to such an abysmal movie.
"Basic Instinct 2: Risk Addiction" is an object lesson in the law of diminishing returns. Sadly I don't think that's enough to stop a third being made. Apparently Sharon Stone is in talks to direct the next instalment. The sad thing being that even if it manages to be worse than this debacle, it will probably get the green light. Only watch this if you're in the mood for high comedy. Every aspect of the film is laughable, until you realise you've been duped out of the price of a ticket and almost two hours of your life.
How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines
Production Year: 2002 - Thriller - Director: Bharat Nalluri, Rob Bailey, Andy Wilson - Original Language: English - Classification: 15 years and over - Starring: Matthew MacFadyen, Keeley Hawes, David Oyelowo, Peter Firth, Jenny Agutter, Lisa Faulkner
Thriller - Original Language: English - Classification: 15 years and over - Starring: Timothy West, Neil Morrissey, Tara Fitzgerald, Annette Crosbie, Pauline Quirke, Rob Brydon, Denise Van Outen, John Thomson, Kevin Whately, David Suchet
Production Year: 2002 - Thriller - Director: K.C. Bascombe - Original Language: English - Classification: 15 years and over - Starring: Jesse James, Rachel Skarsten, Charles Powell, Linda Purl, Kevin Zegars
I went to see this, but have to agree it was a let down. I thought David Morrissey was terrible in it.
annaroos1 23.04.2006 18:31
hey, thanks for that great review. Would like to say that I will give it a mis now, but I think I may well have to watch it just for the comedy factor...LOVED your review!
Gemerina 23.04.2006 17:30
was quite looking forward to the second installment but i think ill give it a miss now lol