...
In the opening sequence to 'Basic Instinct 2', Catherine is racing through the roadways of night time London at a hundred miles - er, correction, a hundred * and-twenty * miles per hour while engaging in risky business in such circumstances: 'self-pleasure' with the help of the football ... Read review
Everything interesting begins in the mind. Dr. Michael Glass (Morrissey) a respected ... more
London criminal psychiatrist is brought in by Scotland Yard detective Roy Washburn (Thewlis) to perform a psychiatric profile and evaluation of novelist Catherine Tramell (Stone) following the mysterious death of a top sports star. Physically drawn to Tramell and mentally intrigued by her Glass is quickly sucked into her web of lies and seduction. The professional boundaries between Glass and Tramell are obliterated when she uncovers his basic instincts...
Postage & Packaging:£0.00 Availability:3-5 working days
The Screen's Deadliest Femme Fatale Returns!London psychiatrist Dr. Michael Glass ... more
(Morrissey) is charismatic, highly respected and at the top of his game. When Detective Superintendent Washburn (Thewlis) asks Glass to analyse a beautiful woman who has been linked to the mysterious death of a famous sports star, his entire world is turned upside down. The woman in question is Catherine Tramell (Stone), best-selling American crime novelist whose fiction has a habit of turning into reality. The magnetism between the two is immediate and Glass is intrigued by Catherine both mentally and physically. Quickly sucked into her web of lies and seduction, Glass' own basic instincts are uncovered as professional boundaries are blurred. As people around him are mysteriously murdered, a deadly battle of wits ensues between Glass and Tramell, leading to a startling climax in which he must make a choice that will change both their lives forever.
Despite its inevitable fate as a critically reviled box-office flop,Basic Instinct 2sure ... more
has a funny way of holding your attention. It's not just Sharon Stone's trash-talk and occasional nudity that keeps you watching, but also the way she gamely earns every cent of her $14 million paycheck, vamping like a real pro in her second outing as mystery novelist and alleged serial killer Catherine Tramell. Now living in London, Catherine sets her lethal sights on Michael Glass (David Morrissey), the control-freak psychiatrist assigned to evaluate her as a risk-addicted suspect in the "accidental" killing of a star soccer player. Turns out Catherine's just getting started (or is she?), and that's bad news for Glass's ex-wife, a tabloid journalist, and the Scotland Yard detective (David Thewlis) who's desperate to put Catherine in jail. With plenty of sex, murder and salacious dialogue,BI2is certainly never boring, especially with the morbid fascination of seeing the once formidable Stone torpedo her career in a sequel that took 14 years (and countless drafts of screenplays and at least one high-profile lawsuit) to bring to the screen. She's still impressively hot at age 47, prompting critic Roger Ebert to observe, "the Catherine Tramell role cannot be played well, but Sharon Stone can play it badly better than any other actress alive." So, while this ill-fated sequel falls just short of being a guilty pleasure (if only because Morrissey is no match for Michael Douglas in the 1992 original), it's enjoyably absurd and slickly produced, and the hot-tub scene is guaranteed to wear out the freeze-frame function on a lot of DVD players. For some viewers, that's reason enough for multiple viewings.--Jeff Shannon
Postage & Packaging:Free! Availability:Usually dispatched within 24 hours...
Despite its inevitable fate as a critically reviled box-office flop,Basic Instinct 2sure ... more
has a funny way of holding your attention. It's not just Sharon Stone's trash-talk and occasional nudity that keeps you watching, but also the way she gamely earns every cent of her $14 million paycheck, vamping like a real pro in her second outing as mystery novelist and alleged serial killer Catherine Tramell. Now living in London, Catherine sets her lethal sights on Michael Glass (David Morrissey), the control-freak psychiatrist assigned to evaluate her as a risk-addicted suspect in the "accidental" killing of a star soccer player. Turns out Catherine's just getting started (or is she?), and that's bad news for Glass's ex-wife, a tabloid journalist, and the Scotland Yard detective (David Thewlis) who's desperate to put Catherine in jail. With plenty of sex, murder and salacious dialogue,BI2is certainly never boring, especially with the morbid fascination of seeing the once formidable Stone torpedo her career in a sequel that took 14 years (and countless drafts of screenplays and at least one high-profile lawsuit) to bring to the screen. She's still impressively hot at age 47, prompting critic Roger Ebert to observe, "the Catherine Tramell role cannot be played well, but Sharon Stone can play it badly better than any other actress alive." So, while this ill-fated sequel falls just short of being a guilty pleasure (if only because Morrissey is no match for Michael Douglas in the 1992 original), it's enjoyably absurd and slickly produced, and the hot-tub scene is guaranteed to wear out the freeze-frame function on a lot of DVD players. For some viewers, that's reason enough for multiple viewings.--Jeff Shannon
Postage & Packaging:£1.21 Availability:Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days...
Thriller - Original Language: English - Classification: 15 years and over - Starring: Timothy West, Neil Morrissey, Tara Fitzgerald, Annette Crosbie, Pauline Quirke, Rob Brydon, Denise Van Outen, John Thomson, Kevin Whately, David Suchet
Production Year: 2002 - Thriller - Director: Bharat Nalluri, Rob Bailey, Andy Wilson - Original Language: English - Classification: 15 years and over - Starring: Matthew MacFadyen, Keeley Hawes, David Oyelowo, Peter Firth, Jenny Agutter, Lisa Faulkner
Advantages: Sharon Stone, David Thewlis. Disadvantages: Preposterous plot, flabby midsection, sketchy characters, puritanical cut, that thing on Gerst's head, Catherine's haircut.
...author who writes about the basic instincts (love, sex, violence). She's a strong, independent woman, yes - but she's also narcissistic, devious, manipulative, sexual in unseemly and aggressive fashion and perhaps, even murderous. I couldn't help thinking that Catherine Tramell was the latest subliminal put-down of the idea of a powerful female (by weak-willed males personified by Dr Glass?). It's a critique that harks back to that evil First Female, ... ...Adam finally partook of the apple from the Tree of Knowledge. (So, is wanting more knowledge a satanic desire, then? But I digress.)
Much has also been made of Sharon Stone's decision to play the vampy seductress once again - * at her age! * - oh, my! Well, yeah, I say that she's certainly free to flaunt it if she's got it. At 47, Ms Stone looks a whole lot trimmer, sexier and more poised than many women ten, twenty years her junior ... more
She's baaack!
Catherine Tramell returns to the screen, and fourteen years after our first shocking encounter with the notorious film anti-heroine, another dead body turns up in suspiciously close proximity.
In the opening sequence to 'Basic Instinct 2', Catherine is racing through the roadways of night time London at a hundred miles - er, correction, a hundred * and-twenty * miles per hour while engaging in risky business in such circumstances: 'self-pleasure' with the help of the football star seated next to her. Soon the speeding little sports car crashes through a large glass pane and plunges into the cold, dark waters of the Thames below. Catherine saves herself while her companion goes down with the car, and it's Detective Roy Washburn's job to find out if Catherine is responsible for the footballer's death.
During police questioning, Catherine's cold, cynical reaction shows no trace of the expected shock, sadness or guilt at what has just transpired. Scotland Yard promptly sends her to Dr. Michael Glass for a psychiatric evaluation. However, when the good doctor attempts to take charge of the situation, he proves to be no match for the aggressive seduction quickly put into play by Catherine. The evaluation over, Dr Glass soon appears in court to give his testimony. His official opinion? Catherine Tramell is 'addicted to risk'. Without firm evidence nailing her for the watery death of Mr Football, Washburn lets her off the hook and she goes on her merry way.
Then Catherine returns to Michael with a tale about pondering his verdict; she's decided she'd like some help with her 'addiction'. He accepts her as a private patient - wholly against his better judgment and usual practice. (But there would be no story if he didn't, would there?)
Well, Michael has just divorced his wife, who is now seeing journalist Adam Towers. Towers may or may not have played a part in Michael's earlier breakdown relating to a previous murder implicating one of his patients. Further roiling the waters is Catherine's later involvement with journalist Adam Towers, too…and…well, do you really want to know more? Because from hereon the plot adds one more preposterous development after another as the movie tries to propel the story forward.
The point is that doubts enter Michael's mind as to whether or not Catherine is telling the truth about anything (including details alarmingly relevant to him), or whether Detective Washburn was or wasn't trying to frame the remorseless Catherine for the footballer's death. When two more people - one close to Michael - suddenly end up dead, too, who is it who did them in? The plot zigs and zags like a drunken sailor - nonsensically - although it gets momentarily bogged down by a flabby midsection. Nonetheless the little twists still manage to screw with your mind, keeping you guessing pretty much until the end. This part I do admit was a bit of fun, even if it was all a wholly superficial pleasure.
The subtext. And supertext?
However, the subtext of the film also nagged at me throughout: Catherine's a successful author who writes about the basic instincts (love, sex, violence). She's a strong, independent woman, yes - but she's also narcissistic, devious, manipulative, sexual in unseemly and aggressive fashion and perhaps, even murderous. I couldn't help thinking that Catherine Tramell was the latest subliminal put-down of the idea of a powerful female (by weak-willed males personified by Dr Glass?). It's a critique that harks back to that evil First Female, Eve, whose exclusive fault it was that good, sweet, innocent Adam finally partook of the apple from the Tree of Knowledge. (So, is wanting more knowledge a satanic desire, then? But I digress.)
Much has also been made of Sharon Stone's decision to play the vampy seductress once again - * at her age! * - oh, my! Well, yeah, I say that she's certainly free to flaunt it if she's got it. At 47, Ms Stone looks a whole lot trimmer, sexier and more poised than many women ten, twenty years her junior (with possibly some help from Botox injections and a surgeon's scalpel? If so, it's just par for the Hollywood course, dearies). That this issue continues to shock and amaze audiences, gossips and some so-called critics in the 21st century USA speaks to the culture's discomfort with the thought of any actress over 40 actually having sex. And liking it. (Au contraire, in that so-called 'cheese-eating monkeyland' called France [as some US rightwing France-bashers called it], Isabelle Huppert, Nathalie Baye and Catherine Deneuve [aged 53, 57 and 62, respectively] are still going strong as potent sexual beings on the big screen - yes, sometimes perversely so - with nary a raised eyebrow for miles.) Time to get over it, guys - who usually seem more disturbed by this.
Alas, there are many other bad things in it besides the tepid script.
As beleaguered and bewildered psychoanalyst Michael Glass, David Morrissey is as boringly average as they come. As expected, he turns quickly to silly putty in Catherine's hot hands. Mr Morrissey does an okay job, but his anger and frustration lack sufficient edge and depth for us to vicariously experience and sympathize with his mental torment. In short, where's that dishy, hunky, superb Clive Owen when you need him?!
Playing Michael's psychoanalyst friend, Milena Gardosh, Charlotte Rampling was distracting, for reasons that are not good. Unlike most roles she's had of late, she is given to more smiles here; problem is, the smiles feel inauthentic, and fail to light up those depressingly hooded eyes. Ms Rampling plays another weakly drawn character on whom Catherine, for whatever reason, seems to be making the moves. Yet all we get from that potential (and predictable) liaison is innuendo, as the film remains shy about their evolving relationship.
Another annoyance came by way of that thick, gray, bird's nest sitting atop the head of the formulaic (I think he was Austrian à la Freud, but I wasn't sure), wild-haired character - yet another psychoanalyst - named Dr Jakob Gerst (Heathcote Williams). When he was on-screen, my mind kept wandering, and wondering if at some point a blue egg would appear on his puffy mane and suddenly crack open to reveal a chirping baby bird. His role in the film? He's another friend of Michael's and Milena's, and - whaddaya know? - serves simply as just another convenient plot device.
(Incidentally, speaking of 'dos, Catherine's choppy haircut might be unique, but it's not much better than Gerst's. I seriously doubt that the style will catch on with many women viewers.)
The sole saving grace…or two.
Sharon Stone's near-campy turn as the predatory Catherine is the major thing going for 'Basic Instinct 2'. The script and the poorly written part of Catherine might fail her much of the time, but it's Ms Stone's smooth and unblinking, laser-like delivery of every line, no matter how lame and tame, that elevates the film to watchable status. While I chuckled and laughed at Catherine's wicked game of relentlessly taunting the proper and repressed Dr Glass, frankly, I wasn't sure if the humourous angle was truly intentional.
At any rate, you have to give credit to Ms Stone for going for the kill, so to speak - taking on the role with wanton, devil-may-care abandon. At times slightly over-the-top, her sinister and mocking pose perhaps tries to compensate for the feeble script, but it was still perverse fun to see what latest twisted joke was on tap to push the increasingly confused, poor Dr Glass into a tailspin. It's a refreshingly open performance, and together with the suggestively sleazy, slimy bit by David Thewlis as Detective Roy Washburn, gives the spark of life and excitement to this dampened-down, allegedly erotic thriller.
Finally, neither erotic nor thrilling enough to really count.
Crippled by a shaky script and sketchy characters, the film finally fails to go the distance and deliver the goods - those requisite thrills and chills, erotic or not. It becomes a merely spoofy exercise, just like that wacky Adam West version of Batman on TV, but with more sex, blood and violence - but it still isn't enough.
For all of Ms Stone's admirable boldness in upping the ante in the steamy sex scenes (many of which lack an 'it' factor; lots of footage were left on the cutting room floor - but there are sites apparently making them available on the Internet), the final decision to tone it down was simply moronic. In aiming for wider audience exposure via an R-rating in the USA (which is the cut audiences on this side of the pond will see), the film's coyness in its treatment of the central element of sex becomes a timid and ultimately ridiculous move, defeating its raison d'être, sacrificed at the altar of commercial and puritanical interests - especially if one were to imagine the infinitely more fascinating, gripping, envelope-pushing limits that someone like David Cronenberg would have taken it. Alas, poor Sharon. 'Twas (almost) all for naught?
NOTE:
Recommended for Sharon Stone fans, and the curious with change to spare.
For those who've seen the film on that side of the Atlantic, I'd like to know if the European cut fares any better than the US one. Do post your review!
Advantages: Dreadful acting, terrible direction, woeful production values and abysmal script Disadvantages: It made me laugh, though I don't think it was supposed to
Catherine Tramell is back! This time the sex-crazed killer is implicated in her footballer husband's death. A staid British psychiatrist is brought in to unravel her secrets, but he soon begins to fall under her spell.
British director Michael Caton-Jones must be hard up for work if this is what he's making. It feels like career suicide just watching it. He's clearly from the school of obvious film-making, if this cut-and-paste job is anything to ... ...any facet of it. London is shot mainly at night, swathed in neon blues, in an attempt to make it sexy. Everyone in the movie appears to be rich and playful if the number of big houses, apartments and cocktail parties are anything to go by. Catherine's risk addiction is embodied solely by her chain-smoking and sexual activity is always signposted by the hackneyed open fire or jacuzzi motifs. You can tell the director is hoping to use the film as a ...
afy9mab 23.04.2006
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful Review of Basic Instinct 2 (DVD)
...when you are talking about Basic Instinct it has to be Sex, Sleaze and of course the "Fuck of the Century…". The other day, I and Sharon where sharing a table in one of the hottest Hollywood hangout place and we were not discussing about the movie Basic Instinct, we were discussing the actual basic instinct. The lady was dressed in her best, a Red skirt with a sliding cleavage display and of course it was one of those dress, guys want to make love ... ...was tempted asking her about Basic Instinct - Risk addiction and was about to ask her , she could see that in my eyes that it was more then the Risk Addiction, it was lust. Asyis, "does Lust form as a part of Risk Addiction and don't you feel being laid so hard that your mind doesn't think of anything but the lady. For a moment didn't knew what to say just was amazed at the women's sixth sense, how did she know that I wanted to know more about the ...
asyis 17.04.2006
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful Review of Basic Instinct 2 (DVD)
Basic Instinct 2 has been a film that I have been waiting to see since the first film came out; however it was very disappointing that it didn’t carry on from the first film. However the film does continue about the life of the novelist Catherine Trammell played remarkably by Sharon Stone. This film has a brilliant opening, as it starts of with Catherine speeding through the streets of London using the hand of her boyfriend to play with herself. ... ...doesn’t compare to the first Basic Instinct. The casting was good choices, as Sharon Stone plays this character to perfection, and really leaves the audience to believe something that may not be true. However I would change the casting of Michael Glass, even through David Morrissey is a good actor I didn’t feel that he was right for the part. The director wasn’t the best choice for the film, he has directed some unmemorable films like City by the ...
xx-baby-davies-xx 03.05.2007
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: helpful Review of Basic Instinct 2 (DVD)
Did you enjoy it?
Story
Characters / Performances
Special Effects
How does it compare to ...
Similar reviews »
Reviews which might be of interest for "Basic Instinct 2 (DVD)"
Advantages: Sharon Stone Disadvantages: Thewlis, Rampling, Collymoore, Williams, Dancy
to the DVD production rather than being the movie and the people who are releasing the DVD printed several thousand discs before they realised and stated "The discs will be released as they are; future prints will be corrected. We feel that the only the most critical eye will notice this error" Well done Columbia Tristar.
BasicInstinct2 will be released on the 7th August to rent or buy. Retail price is £19.99 but you can purchase the DVD from play.com for £12.99. My advice buy your other half a bottle of plonk and rent it instead. ...
Advantages: The men will like Sharon Stone Disadvantages: Terrible storyline, terrible acting
and the body of a 25 year old when in reality she was pushing 50. Although Michael Douglas played a believable role in the first film, to my mind it wouldn?t have been the huge success it was if it wasn?t for Sharon Stone. She manages to encapsulate every man?s fantasy with that added hint of danger to top it all off. She portrays those same traits in BasicInstinct2 however she didn?t seem to play the role half as well as she did 14 years previous. She still manages to retain the brazen and unconcealed sex appeal which I?m sure will please a lot of the eager male audience that were hoping for a repeat of the steamy scenes from the last film however for me, she seems to be trying a little too hard. In the first film she was able to encapsulate that menacing yet sexy persona with ease but second time around seems forced and awkward and was a bit ...
Advantages: Yes Sharon Stone gets naked. woooooo... *rolls eyes* Disadvantages: Just tell me who killed who will you?!
This movie will drive you up the wall.
Normally I'm a fan of cleverly written films. I love plot twists, films where you have to work things out, and endings you don't expect. However I do expect AN ENDING!
What happened here?! Unfortunately I have not seen the first BasicInstinct film, but from what I gather it was a movie that you felt really uncomfortable watching with your grandparents.
Fortunately I don't think this movie will have the same problem. It is more likely that your grandparents will have slipped into some sort of confusion induced comma before she gets to see Sharon Stone doing the dirty stuff.
For those of you wanting to see this JUST to see Sharon Stone naked (that's lonely 40 year old men and creepy teenage guys) then here is your review. YES she gets naked and YES she gets it doggy style. Review over ...
suitably chilling, well scripted, well executed, superb acting from everyone involved - as soon as I can, I intend to make this a part of my video col
ending is slightly spoiled by the opening scene, also the ending is in a similar vein to Se7en i.e. heart wrenching, which some people might not like (*)
Production Year: 1981 - Mystery - Original Language: English - Classification: 15 years and over - Starring: Maureen Lipman, Bernard Cribbins, Bill Maynard, Joss Ackland, Frank Windsor