There isn't enough about Muse on this site. Are there any fellow Muse fans out there? Make yourselve...
There isn't enough about Muse on this site. Are there any fellow Muse fans out there? Make yourselves known...We'll start some sort of club.
Member since:30.05.2001
Reviews:93
Members who trust:113
Just when you're starting to lose faith in the British film industry, Danny Boyle comes to the rescue with a beautifully made and brilliantly British movie. So far this year we've had the efforts of Ken Loach and Mike Leigh who continue in their eternal campaign to depress Britain with well made yet soul destroying movies, and another Asian/British culture clash movie. Whilst All Or Nothing and Sweet Sixteen are good films, isn’t about time they tried something new, aren’t we all well aware that not everyone enjoys a good standard of living?
Director Danny Boyle shows that we are capable of making films about things other than poverty and in the process, delivers a genre reviving, sure-fire cult hit that gives all the style of a Hollywood movie coupled with a very British atmosphere. Just as the Zombie movie seemed to be dying thanks to the brain junk food that was Resident Evil, 28 Days Later is a breath of fresh air to a worn out genre and much needed proof that the British film industry is anything but dead.
28 Days Later is rated 18, which in this case is a good sign as it shows that the film makers are more concerned with making the film they envisioned, rather than the soulless product of a committee that want to keep it rated 15 in order to maximise profits. You would be forgiven for thinking that it is impossible to make a zombie movie that has any hint of originality after Resident Evil which took the formula and tried to kill it. 28 Days Later blessedly erases all memories of
that monstrosity and replaces it with an assured Horror/Thriller that adds something new to the genre.
The plot is best described as Outbreak+ Night Of The Living Dead + Day Of The Triffids - Hollywood + Britain = 28 Days Later. It begins with animal activists trying to free a lab full of rage infected monkeys, a technician warns them but they don’t heed his advice and free the animals proving that the road to hell is indeed paved with good intentions. As soon as the cage is opened the infected creature savages one of the activists who is instantly turned and then infects everyone else by violently vomiting blood in their faces. The film then dramatically cuts to 28 days later as Cillian Murphy (Jim) wakes up in hospital from a coma and finds only the devastation that has been left behind. Curiously, Cillian Murphy is obviously a fan of the Kevin Bacon method of acting whereby you get naked at every opportunity, and he treats us to his naked body lying asleep at the start of the movie and then strips off whenever the script allows.
Walking out of hospital, he finds a deserted London devoid of any signs of life and goes in search of an explanation. This sequence, where he wanders the London streets justifies watching the film on its own and is undoubtedly one of the most spectacular shots ever filmed. The Director cleared certain areas in order to get the shots which was extremely disruptive and time consuming, but watching the result you can see that it was worth it. Seeing places that we recognise is cool enough, but seeing it all empty is strange, disturbing and thought provoking. The rage virus that has infected apparently the whole world is a disturbing enough idea, so the thought of ‘The Infected’, who run extremely fast and spew diseased blood into their victims faces may be enough to put off those who aren’t fans of horror. Everyone else however, is in for a treat…
Once Jim has joined up with some of the remaining survivors the film becomes part road movie British style in what is the highlight as they travel north to meet others who have sent out a radio broadcast. Once they arrive, the film again changes tack and builds up to a superb climax that combines the best suspense tactics with blood chilling violence. I will leave out the rest of the plot and ending and say nothing more about it except that the image of Jim, stripped to the waist, covered in rain, mud and blood gouging someone’s eyes out with his fingers is one that burns itself onto the memory.
As you can guess from the last paragraph, yes, it is a violent film bordering on the gratuitous at times, but as it’s a zombie film, I think we can allow it. Consequently, criticising the film for its violence is not really valid as it would be like saying that Natural Born Killers is too violent. Listen close everyone; IT’S MEANT TO BE! Nobody wants to see a non-violent horror film, that would be like a Porno without the sex, it’s essential to the formula. I can understand objections to violence in children’s films or James Bond, it’s not always necessary, but you would have to be missing a piece of your brain to fault a violent film for being too violent. The gore is by no means over the top, since this would turn it into an unintentional black comedy and the levels are nicely judged so that the horror remains plausible and doesn’t sink into cartoon violence.
The main defence of the violence is that it’s gorgeously choreographed and shot, just like the rest of the movie. The standard of photography set in the London scenes is maintained throughout and manages to be beautiful without being too arty or pretentious. To accuse the Director of covering a bad film with a glossy coat as Road To Perdition did last month is also not true, as every aspect is strong, from the Direction to the acting to the script to the locations. Using a cast of unknown actors apart from Christopher Eccleston is a smart move and racks the tension even higher as it increases the fears of who is next. The only quibble from me is that the film was shot largely on digital film that looks utterly ugly, dirty and cheap. This is to be expected from a director famous for working on small budgets to great effect, but in this case, we wanted sharp clean images, particularly for the shots of London and at times the image is so blurry that faces are obscured. It also strangely works to the films advantage however since the subject matter is dark and disturbing. It goes well with the grainy image as though the film was made by survivors of the virus who salvaged what film they could.
The performances are all believable and enjoyable with a particularly brilliant bit of casting in Christopher Ecceleston, who we are terrified of the minute we see him without knowing why. 28 Days Later combines brutal violence with humour and moments of intense poignancy that combine to leave you feeling exhilarated and excited at the end the way all good movies should leave you feeling. There may be a few moments that feel as though they belong to another movie, but by the end I was high on entertainment, and as the movie is from a well worn genre anyway, that makes it even more of an achievement. Even if you don’t enjoy it, just be appreciative of the accomplishment, and thankful that it didn’t star Leonardo DiCaprio as Boyles last movie The Beach did. Now lets all go and watch that bit in Titanic where he freezes to death again…
How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines
Production Year: 1984 - Horror - Director: Joe Dante - Original Language: English - Classification: 15 years and over - Starring: Zach Galligan, Phoebe Cates, Hoyt Axton, Polly Holliday, Frances Lee McCain, Judge Reinhold, Corey Feldman
Production Year: 2004 - Horror - Director: M. Night Shyamalan - Original Language: English - Classification: 12 years and over - Starring: Bryce Dallas Howard, Joaquin Phoenix, Adrien Brody, William Hurt, Sigourney Weaver, Brendan Gleeson
absolutley, its so fantastic when u see a british film that isnt a load of pants, id say this one is definatly a credit to the british film industry. really well thought out, enjoyable to watch (altho a bit scary!), especially stunning when u get to see london completely uninhabited, and OH MY GOD how utterly beautifull is that irish guy!
lostprophet 11.04.2003 17:26
Yeah nice op. I enjoyed the film and it was nice to see Zombies that ran....gave the protagonists something to be scared about!
TJ-Mackey 05.12.2002 11:19
I really wasn't too impressed with some of the acting (the actress playing Hannah was particularly bad) but yeah, overall I found the film pretty interesting. I'd probably give it 7/10.
Anti-vivisection activists make a very bad judgment call and release an experimental ... more
monkey infected with "rage".28 Days Later..., as the title has it, bicycle messenger Cillian Murphy wakes up from a post-traffic accident coma in a deserted London hos...
Postage & Packaging: £1.21 Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days...
Anti-vivisection activists make a very bad judgment call and release an experimental ... more
monkey infected with "rage".28 Days Later..., as the title has it, bicycle messenger Cillian Murphy wakes up from a post-traffic accident coma in a deserted London hos...
Postage & Packaging: Free! Availability: Usually dispatched within 24 hours...
A powerful virus is unleashed on the British public following a raid on a primate research ... more
facility by animal rights activists. Transmitted in a drop of blood and devastating within seconds, the virus locks those infected into a permanent murderous rag...
In this film from director Danny Boyle and writer Alex Garland a powerful virus is ... more
unleashed on the British public following a raid on a primate research facility by animal rights activists. Transmitted in a drop of blood and devastating within second...
Postage & Packaging: £0.00 Availability: 3-5 working days
Advantages: An entertaining film, shows london completely deserted and makes you think! Disadvantages: Not as scary as it's made out to be, too many holes and inconsistences in the plot
GR-Design 11.11.2002 ·
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful
Review of 28 Days Later (DVD)